22 sec in total
180 ms
21.4 sec
344 ms
Visit wearegloo.com now to see the best up-to-date Weare Gloo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wearegloo.com
Chances are that you’ve stumbled upon this page because you’re looking for a content marketing agency. Luckily for you, that’s exactly what we are. And a pr ...
Visit wearegloo.comWe analyzed Wearegloo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 4 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
wearegloo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.141
78/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
180 ms
407 ms
78 ms
156 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Wearegloo.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to 0 and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source .
Page size can be reduced by 115.6 kB (50%)
231.4 kB
115.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Wearegloo.com main page is 231.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 136.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weare Gloo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wearegloo.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)
29
11
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weare Gloo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wearegloo.com
180 ms
wearegloo.com
407 ms
cv.css
78 ms
cvpro.min.css
156 ms
style.min.css
307 ms
job-listings.css
231 ms
custom-style-blocks.css
310 ms
css
35 ms
genericons.css
309 ms
style.css
233 ms
blocks.css
238 ms
jquery.min.js
387 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
319 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
71 ms
cv.js
317 ms
cvpro.min.js
468 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
383 ms
functions.js
425 ms
typed.js
466 ms
demos.js
424 ms
ajax.js
505 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
17 ms
What_square.svg
20434 ms
Different_square.svg
20428 ms
Think_square.svg
20428 ms
Talk_square.svg
20428 ms
Gloo-Logo_RGB_2016-1.svg
110 ms
AdobeStock_152533436.svg
112 ms
opinion.svg
115 ms
AdobeStock_178588822.svg
110 ms
001-twitter.svg
119 ms
002-linkedin.svg
120 ms
lazy_image.png
151 ms
AdobeStock_152533436.svg
114 ms
search-icon-2.svg
77 ms
9XUilJ90n1fBFg7ceXwUyn5YzZGt.woff
23 ms
9XUilJ90n1fBFg7ceXwUrn9YzZGt.woff
28 ms
9XUnlJ90n1fBFg7ceXwcf1tL.woff
39 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
78 ms
wearegloo.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wearegloo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
wearegloo.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearegloo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wearegloo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wearegloo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weare Gloo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: