Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

wearepes.com

Forum - WEarePES.com

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

wearepes.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wearepes.com homepage info - get ready to check WEarePES best content for Cameroon right away, or after learning these important things about wearepes.com

Communauté de fans de Pro Evolution Soccer depuis 2003

Visit wearepes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wearepes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wearepes.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1180 ms

index.css

398 ms

script.js

399 ms

theme.js

394 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Wearepes.com, 15% (17 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 15% (17 requests) were made to New.wearepes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Winningelevenblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 645.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Wearepes.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 89.5 kB

  • Original 121.2 kB
  • After minification 119.5 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 82.8 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WEarePES images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 203.0 kB

  • Original 301.7 kB
  • After minification 286.6 kB
  • After compression 98.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 269.8 kB

  • Original 324.9 kB
  • After minification 302.7 kB
  • After compression 55.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wearepes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (38%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WEarePES. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wearepes.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

wearepes.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

wearepes.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wearepes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wearepes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WEarePES. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: