10.3 sec in total
400 ms
6.2 sec
3.8 sec
Visit webalive.in now to see the best up-to-date Web Alive content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webalive.in
From Crafting a Website to Customizing Digital Business Cards, we at Web Alive India aim to build your Digital Success & Brand Identity.
Visit webalive.inWe analyzed Webalive.in page load time and found that the first response time was 400 ms and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
webalive.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
400 ms
1408 ms
68 ms
396 ms
398 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Webalive.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webalive.in.
Page size can be reduced by 600.1 kB (20%)
3.0 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Webalive.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 408.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Alive needs image optimization as it can save up to 408.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 36 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
24
24
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Alive. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
webalive.in
400 ms
webalive.in
1408 ms
e-202409.js
68 ms
harshal-nimkande.jpg
396 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2021-05-28-at-00.47.00.jpeg
398 ms
Dr-Nikunj.jpg
403 ms
email-decode.min.js
18 ms
harshal-nimkande.jpg
777 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2021-05-28-at-00.47.00.jpeg
805 ms
Dr-Nikunj.jpg
782 ms
Web-Alive-India-Logo.jpg
2024 ms
laptop-min.png
1286 ms
website-icon-5.png
389 ms
dbc-icon-4.png
395 ms
Google-My-Business-icon-1.png
392 ms
Head-one-banner.png
1167 ms
DBC-sample-500x700-1.png
1179 ms
GMB-1-1024x807.png
1373 ms
Cornel-Rithika-Live.jpg
393 ms
SDC-Social.jpg
399 ms
Profile-resume.jpg
398 ms
Thalassemia-6.jpg
783 ms
Dr.-Paras_VC-min.jpg
782 ms
Hunger-Games-Burger.jpg
786 ms
Desk.jpg
785 ms
LG_Post1.jpg
790 ms
dbc-14.jpg
914 ms
poshaak-l.jpg
1171 ms
Web-Alive-India-Logo-100x100.jpg
22 ms
website-icon-5.png
585 ms
Google-My-Business-icon-1.png
592 ms
Cornel-Rithika-Live.jpg
1921 ms
dbc-icon-4.png
1353 ms
Profile-resume.jpg
794 ms
SDC-Social.jpg
802 ms
Dr.-Paras_VC-min.jpg
810 ms
Thalassemia-6.jpg
2088 ms
Desk.jpg
1729 ms
Hunger-Games-Burger.jpg
816 ms
LG_Post1.jpg
1967 ms
dbc-14.jpg
1991 ms
poshaak-l.jpg
2000 ms
webalive.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webalive.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webalive.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webalive.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webalive.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webalive.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Alive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: