5.6 sec in total
468 ms
3.9 sec
1.2 sec
Visit webalive.it now to see the best up-to-date Webalive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webalive.it
CAF Milano Successioni Ereditaria 730 fare Isee Naspi cafmilano Punto Amico fare 730 Milano Servizi fiscali per il cittadino
Visit webalive.itWe analyzed Webalive.it page load time and found that the first response time was 468 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
webalive.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value11,210 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
468 ms
679 ms
1026 ms
123 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webalive.it, 56% (19 requests) were made to 730point.it and 12% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source 730point.it.
Page size can be reduced by 663.0 kB (70%)
947.9 kB
284.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Webalive.it main page is 947.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 663.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 561.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 561.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webalive needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.4 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 144 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (54%)
28
13
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webalive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
webalive.it
468 ms
730point.it
679 ms
www.730point.it
1026 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
123 ms
css
63 ms
css
77 ms
jquery.min.js
245 ms
js
92 ms
js
138 ms
getcod.cgi
769 ms
lazysizes.min.js
531 ms
css
70 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
530 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
768 ms
dom-ready.min.js
768 ms
hooks.min.js
767 ms
i18n.min.js
766 ms
a11y.min.js
767 ms
api.js
84 ms
autoptimize_7555a23cc32dec981c25f25ce2416bef.js
960 ms
50x50-loader.gif
679 ms
loader1.gif
821 ms
730point-caf-milano-punto-amico-730-elettronico-caf-online.jpg
850 ms
analytics.js
391 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
830 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
387 ms
js
145 ms
collect
173 ms
collect
168 ms
collect
48 ms
recaptcha__en.js
79 ms
cropped-log-punto-amico-e1606127592273-1.jpg
158 ms
log-punto-amicopngmedio.png
217 ms
Whatsapp-contatto-caf.png
214 ms
webalive.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webalive.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webalive.it SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webalive.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webalive.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webalive.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webalive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: