Tools & Wizards About Us
webart.technology screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

webart.technology

WebArt Technology | Best Digital Solution Agency In Kolkata

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

webart.technology screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webart.technology homepage info - get ready to check Web Art best content right away, or after learning these important things about webart.technology

WebArt Technology is one of the Best digital marketing agencies/companies in Salt Lake and provides the best services for your business.

Visit webart.technology

Key Findings

We analyzed Webart.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webart.technology performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webart.technology

140 ms

webart.technology

384 ms

wpo-minify-header-3e9c2670.min.css

148 ms

wpo-minify-header-f5440c18.min.js

387 ms

all.min.css

329 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Webart.technology, 5% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Webart.technology.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 210.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webart.technology main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 87.1 kB

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 80.0 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 66.3 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Art images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

  • Original 185.1 kB
  • After minification 185.1 kB
  • After compression 164.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 147.4 kB
  • After minification 147.4 kB
  • After compression 111.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webart.technology needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (41%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

56

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Art. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webart.technology

webart.technology

140 ms

webart.technology

webart.technology

384 ms

wpo-minify-header-3e9c2670.min.css

wpo-minify-header-3e9c2670.min.css

148 ms

wpo-minify-header-f5440c18.min.js

wpo-minify-header-f5440c18.min.js

387 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

329 ms

animations.css

animations.css

269 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

442 ms

mmenu-light.css

mmenu-light.css

252 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

238 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

310 ms

style.css

style.css

375 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

429 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

style.css

style.css

537 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

60 ms

aos.css

aos.css

106 ms

animate.css

animate.css

451 ms

icofont.css

icofont.css

632 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

72 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

87 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

812 ms

css3-animate-it.js

css3-animate-it.js

739 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

714 ms

mmenu-light.polyfills.js

mmenu-light.polyfills.js

784 ms

mmenu-light.js

mmenu-light.js

783 ms

script.js

script.js

932 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

55 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

52 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

53 ms

aos.js

aos.js

123 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

73 ms

vanilla-tilt.js

vanilla-tilt.js

984 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

73 ms

main.js

main.js

930 ms

custom.js

custom.js

929 ms

loader.js

loader.js

63 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

66 ms

wpo-minify-footer-22381f88.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-22381f88.min.js

1073 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

114 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

11 ms

css2

css2

27 ms

css2

css2

39 ms

lftracker_v1_lYNOR8xYVQN7WQJZ.js

lftracker_v1_lYNOR8xYVQN7WQJZ.js

85 ms

flame.png

flame.png

76 ms

pattern.jpg

pattern.jpg

297 ms

logo.png

logo.png

630 ms

1.png

1.png

631 ms

4.png

4.png

625 ms

5.png

5.png

625 ms

2.png

2.png

626 ms

3.png

3.png

627 ms

banner-mask.jpg

banner-mask.jpg

667 ms

robot.png

robot.png

1120 ms

circle.png

circle.png

688 ms

plus.png

plus.png

687 ms

mask3.jpg

mask3.jpg

688 ms

1.png

1.png

983 ms

1.png

1.png

814 ms

2.png

2.png

766 ms

3.png

3.png

789 ms

4.png

4.png

771 ms

5.png

5.png

926 ms

6.png

6.png

940 ms

ourcreativeagencyt.png

ourcreativeagencyt.png

1231 ms

mask4.jpg

mask4.jpg

941 ms

check.png

check.png

1003 ms

chooseussection.png

chooseussection.png

1764 ms

ourvisionandmissionbg.png

ourvisionandmissionbg.png

1311 ms

mask5.jpg

mask5.jpg

1068 ms

7.png

7.png

1056 ms

Work%20Sans%20Regular.woff

Work%20Sans%20Regular.woff

1133 ms

flame.png

flame.png

571 ms

Proxima%20Nova%20Black.woff

Proxima%20Nova%20Black.woff

1199 ms

d.woff

d.woff

1197 ms

Work%20Sans%20Light.woff

Work%20Sans%20Light.woff

1245 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1733 ms

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

48 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1245 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

1533 ms

circle2.png

circle2.png

1165 ms

thincircle.png

thincircle.png

1175 ms

6.png

6.png

1201 ms

mask6.jpg

mask6.jpg

959 ms

creativitypolygon.png

creativitypolygon.png

984 ms

creative.jpg

creative.jpg

1028 ms

creative2.jpg

creative2.jpg

1227 ms

7.png

7.png

1078 ms

mask7.jpg

mask7.jpg

1138 ms

ourteamwt.png

ourteamwt.png

1251 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1206 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1205 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1249 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1238 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1192 ms

Untitled-design-12.jpg

Untitled-design-12.jpg

1237 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1194 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

1250 ms

mask8.jpg

mask8.jpg

1136 ms

user.png

user.png

1119 ms

mask9.jpg

mask9.jpg

1120 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

1109 ms

formcircle.png

formcircle.png

1116 ms

subscribepartdownleft.png

subscribepartdownleft.png

1168 ms

quote.png

quote.png

1056 ms

quote2.png

quote2.png

1029 ms

wpo-minify-header-8bd01342.min.css

wpo-minify-header-8bd01342.min.css

83 ms

Accessibility Review

webart.technology accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webart.technology best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webart.technology SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webart.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webart.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webart.technology

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Art. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: