Tools & Wizards About Us
webastral.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

webastral.com

Web Design, Mobile App & Web Development Company

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

630 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

webastral.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Astral content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webastral.com

Being a leading apps development company, we develop mobile & web applications to optimize processes, connect more users & bring brands closer to consumers.

Visit webastral.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webastral.com page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webastral.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.364

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webastral.com

630 ms

www.webastral.com

483 ms

www.webastral.com

1187 ms

4b1t5.css

417 ms

font-awesome.min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Webastral.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Webastral.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 328.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webastral.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 74.3 kB

  • Original 85.9 kB
  • After minification 78.3 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 233.8 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Astral images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 430.8 kB
  • After minification 430.8 kB
  • After compression 412.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 46.5 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webastral.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (65%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Astral. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webastral.com

webastral.com

630 ms

www.webastral.com

www.webastral.com

483 ms

www.webastral.com

www.webastral.com

1187 ms

4b1t5.css

4b1t5.css

417 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

45 ms

48c9j.css

48c9j.css

423 ms

48c9k.js

48c9k.js

839 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

90 ms

css

css

56 ms

48c9j.css

48c9j.css

628 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

15 ms

48c9k.js

48c9k.js

868 ms

48c9j.css

48c9j.css

865 ms

48c9k.js

48c9k.js

630 ms

js

js

83 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

639 ms

responsive-slider.js

responsive-slider.js

863 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

889 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

888 ms

es-widget.js

es-widget.js

1078 ms

es-widget-page.js

es-widget-page.js

1077 ms

js

js

73 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

1078 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

1079 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

1079 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

1079 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

1252 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

1251 ms

script.js

script.js

1251 ms

script.js

script.js

1253 ms

player.js

player.js

1259 ms

client.js

client.js

1270 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1460 ms

api.js

api.js

49 ms

webastral-logo.png

webastral-logo.png

231 ms

web-bg.png

web-bg.png

1745 ms

design-bg.png

design-bg.png

1329 ms

design-img.png

design-img.png

1119 ms

App-bg.png

App-bg.png

1351 ms

App-img.png

App-img.png

723 ms

seo-bg.png

seo-bg.png

1329 ms

SEM-img.png

SEM-img.png

939 ms

about-us1.jpg

about-us1.jpg

1361 ms

sketch2.png

sketch2.png

1337 ms

creative1.png

creative1.png

1540 ms

design.png

design.png

1541 ms

final.png

final.png

1546 ms

footer-shape.png

footer-shape.png

1571 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1797 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1770 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

104 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

100 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

101 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

101 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

102 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

35 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

47 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1592 ms

webastral-logo.png

webastral-logo.png

1596 ms

fallback

fallback

42 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

5 ms

css

css

30 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

9 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

22 ms

Accessibility Review

webastral.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webastral.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webastral.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webastral.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webastral.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webastral.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Astral. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: