Tools & Wizards About Us
webattack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

webattack.com

SnapFiles freeware and shareware downloads and reviews, trusted for quality since 1997

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

162 ms

webattack.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webattack content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webattack.com

Download freeware and shareware programs, fully reviewed and rated by SnapFiles staff, and user reviews. Established in 1997

Visit webattack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webattack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webattack.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webattack.com

145 ms

www.snapfiles.com

493 ms

reset.css

174 ms

cs3.css

233 ms

snapfiles10-5.css

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webattack.com, 62% (58 requests) were made to Snapfiles.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (580 ms) relates to the external source Snapfiles.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

846.7 kB

After Optimization

709.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webattack.com main page is 846.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 592.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 61.4 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.4 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 171.1 kB
  • After minification 161.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webattack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 592.0 kB
  • After minification 591.7 kB
  • After compression 527.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 13.8 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webattack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (53%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

41

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webattack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webattack.com

webattack.com

145 ms

www.snapfiles.com

www.snapfiles.com

493 ms

reset.css

reset.css

174 ms

cs3.css

cs3.css

233 ms

snapfiles10-5.css

snapfiles10-5.css

306 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

65 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

92 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

37 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

58 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

sflogo-smaller.png

sflogo-smaller.png

99 ms

searchbg.png

searchbg.png

98 ms

searchbutton.png

searchbutton.png

99 ms

navarrow-down.png

navarrow-down.png

98 ms

navarrow-up.png

navarrow-up.png

178 ms

tixati-hl.png

tixati-hl.png

354 ms

main-nav-arrow.png

main-nav-arrow.png

178 ms

i_regcool.png

i_regcool.png

179 ms

trendup.png

trendup.png

252 ms

i_fastcopy.gif

i_fastcopy.gif

252 ms

i_editpad.gif

i_editpad.gif

282 ms

i_hdcleaner.png

i_hdcleaner.png

304 ms

i_autohotkey.gif

i_autohotkey.gif

305 ms

i_ToDoList.gif

i_ToDoList.gif

303 ms

i_gimp.gif

i_gimp.gif

317 ms

i_machetelite.gif

i_machetelite.gif

359 ms

trenddown.png

trenddown.png

361 ms

i_delonreboot.png

i_delonreboot.png

362 ms

i_rammon.gif

i_rammon.gif

364 ms

alterpdf.png

alterpdf.png

476 ms

40star.png

40star.png

473 ms

userrating5.png

userrating5.png

474 ms

i_SuperAntiSpyware.gif

i_SuperAntiSpyware.gif

472 ms

expand.png

expand.png

471 ms

userrating4.png

userrating4.png

473 ms

t_superantispy.png

t_superantispy.png

506 ms

popmeter6.png

popmeter6.png

505 ms

i_skype.gif

i_skype.gif

505 ms

45star.png

45star.png

521 ms

userrating3.png

userrating3.png

522 ms

t_skype.jpg

t_skype.jpg

522 ms

popmeter8.png

popmeter8.png

533 ms

i_mailstore.png

i_mailstore.png

534 ms

50star.png

50star.png

539 ms

t_mailstore.png

t_mailstore.png

580 ms

i_treesize.gif

i_treesize.gif

577 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

81 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

81 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

89 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

106 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

108 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

t_treesize.png

t_treesize.png

473 ms

i_plasso.gif

i_plasso.gif

496 ms

t_plasso.png

t_plasso.png

498 ms

i_iobituninst.png

i_iobituninst.png

488 ms

js

js

62 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

235 ms

t_iobituninst.png

t_iobituninst.png

452 ms

popmeter4.png

popmeter4.png

478 ms

i_hwinfo.gif

i_hwinfo.gif

411 ms

t_hwinfo.png

t_hwinfo.png

400 ms

popmeter7.png

popmeter7.png

400 ms

i_earthalerts.gif

i_earthalerts.gif

380 ms

t_earthalerts.png

t_earthalerts.png

385 ms

i_helpmanual.gif

i_helpmanual.gif

406 ms

t_helpmanual.gif

t_helpmanual.gif

406 ms

i_drivermaglite.gif

i_drivermaglite.gif

413 ms

30star.png

30star.png

383 ms

t_drivermaglite.png

t_drivermaglite.png

362 ms

i_httptoolkit.png

i_httptoolkit.png

386 ms

i_browserdownloads.png

i_browserdownloads.png

406 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

46 ms

ads

ads

539 ms

ads

ads

555 ms

18414469464773535794

18414469464773535794

22 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

23 ms

s

s

9 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

46 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

46 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

9 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

200 ms

icon.png

icon.png

12 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

179 ms

activeview

activeview

72 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

89 ms

bbae3fd3506d8d9338f85d10ea9db8af.js

bbae3fd3506d8d9338f85d10ea9db8af.js

43 ms

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

21 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

25 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

43 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

43 ms

sa30O7WeJNzu8x7oKdCcujxNj08-gvZudrea3FT7Uzc.js

sa30O7WeJNzu8x7oKdCcujxNj08-gvZudrea3FT7Uzc.js

18 ms

Accessibility Review

webattack.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

webattack.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webattack.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webattack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webattack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webattack.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webattack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: