21.5 sec in total
256 ms
20.9 sec
269 ms
Visit webcarve.in now to see the best up-to-date Webcarve content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webcarve.in
Webcarve Infotech - Company Located in Pune, Offer Web design and development, Graphics design, Software development and SEO services. Contact +91 8087649269.
Visit webcarve.inWe analyzed Webcarve.in page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
webcarve.in performance score
256 ms
20016 ms
67 ms
124 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Webcarve.in, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Gc.kis.v2.scr.kaspersky-labs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 418.5 kB (12%)
3.5 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Webcarve.in main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webcarve images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webcarve.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (61%)
59
23
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webcarve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webcarve.in
256 ms
main.js
20016 ms
demo.css
67 ms
style17.css
124 ms
bootstrap.min.css
191 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
127 ms
magnific-popup.css
135 ms
font-awesome.css
127 ms
style.css
132 ms
contactform.css
187 ms
animate.css
194 ms
modernizr.custom.53451.js
191 ms
jssor.slider.min.js
260 ms
optinchat.js
77 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
258 ms
plugins.js
313 ms
app.js
253 ms
jquery.min.js
315 ms
bootstrap.min.js
261 ms
jquery.parallax.js
318 ms
smoothscroll.js
323 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
322 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
324 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
378 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
377 ms
waypoints.min.js
380 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
386 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
389 ms
scripts.js
386 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
jquery.gallery.js
442 ms
css
19 ms
css
20 ms
css
19 ms
fbevents.js
45 ms
analytics.js
89 ms
logo.png
210 ms
01.jpg
406 ms
02.png
630 ms
03.jpg
341 ms
04.png
463 ms
01.png
276 ms
02.png
352 ms
03.png
460 ms
04.png
408 ms
01.png
478 ms
02.png
531 ms
03.jpg
474 ms
04.png
586 ms
loading.gif
521 ms
a02.png
530 ms
embed
261 ms
bg3.jpg
519 ms
bg.jpg
566 ms
bg1.jpg
566 ms
social.png
573 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
36 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
37 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
39 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
39 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
39 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
39 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
38 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
525 ms
collect
30 ms
js
69 ms
search.js
3 ms
geometry.js
6 ms
main.js
12 ms
webcarve.in SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webcarve.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webcarve.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webcarve.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webcarve. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: