Tools & Wizards About Us
webchoiceuk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

webchoiceuk.com

Web Development Company UK | Web Design Company London

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

388 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

webchoiceuk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webchoiceuk.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Choice UK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webchoiceuk.com

Web Choice UK is an award-winning web development and digital marketing company - Giving outstanding results through branding, web design, web development and result oriented SEO and online marketing.

Visit webchoiceuk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webchoiceuk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webchoiceuk.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webchoiceuk.com

388 ms

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

676 ms

css2

37 ms

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

default-passive-events

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webchoiceuk.com, 74% (61 requests) were made to Webdesignchoice.co.uk and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Webdesignchoice.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

994.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webchoiceuk.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 918.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 282.0 kB

  • Original 359.4 kB
  • After minification 359.4 kB
  • After compression 77.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 282.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 918.5 kB
  • After minification 896.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Choice UK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (12%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

66

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Choice UK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webchoiceuk.com

webchoiceuk.com

388 ms

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

676 ms

css2

css2

37 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

default-passive-events

default-passive-events

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

37 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

12 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

20 ms

js

js

260 ms

default-passive-events@2.0.0

default-passive-events@2.0.0

17 ms

index.umd.js

index.umd.js

14 ms

banner_new1.jpg

banner_new1.jpg

387 ms

10f9f144-3e6b-4812-9473-d678e335cb75.js

10f9f144-3e6b-4812-9473-d678e335cb75.js

459 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

230 ms

banner_new1.jpg

banner_new1.jpg

537 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

433 ms

bg-shadow.png

bg-shadow.png

444 ms

kenwood-logo4.webp

kenwood-logo4.webp

439 ms

xuniversal4.webp

xuniversal4.webp

445 ms

xcitizen4.webp

xcitizen4.webp

586 ms

zesty.webp

zesty.webp

690 ms

MEDDICC.webp

MEDDICC.webp

689 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

683 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

684 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

778 ms

icon4.png

icon4.png

826 ms

icon5.png

icon5.png

915 ms

icon6.png

icon6.png

922 ms

icon7.png

icon7.png

937 ms

icon8.png

icon8.png

940 ms

icon9.png

icon9.png

1016 ms

middle-hang-bg.png

middle-hang-bg.png

1071 ms

kwood.webp

kwood.webp

1248 ms

MN.webp

MN.webp

1257 ms

my-porter.webp

my-porter.webp

1267 ms

th.webp

th.webp

1257 ms

hyte.webp

hyte.webp

1334 ms

xmakosh.jpg

xmakosh.jpg

1401 ms

justin-t.png

justin-t.png

1648 ms

star-black.png

star-black.png

1489 ms

Porter.webp

Porter.webp

1600 ms

acb.png

acb.png

1528 ms

Jason.png

Jason.png

1584 ms

139586233_3697726480264211_3966676152453267698_n.jpg

139586233_3697726480264211_3966676152453267698_n.jpg

1644 ms

jan.webp

jan.webp

1733 ms

jkdoors-logo.webp

jkdoors-logo.webp

1765 ms

responsive-design-bg-2.png

responsive-design-bg-2.png

2151 ms

code-icon.png

code-icon.png

1850 ms

FluidDesign.png

FluidDesign.png

1896 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

100 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

136 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

203 ms

js

js

109 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

175 ms

insight.beta.min.js

insight.beta.min.js

9 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

102 ms

UI-UX.png

UI-UX.png

1570 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

blog-icon.png

blog-icon.png

1552 ms

seo-mistake.png

seo-mistake.png

1828 ms

loading-thumb.png

loading-thumb.png

1742 ms

thumb-magic.png

thumb-magic.png

1927 ms

thumb-google.png

thumb-google.png

1790 ms

thumb-google-business.png

thumb-google-business.png

1807 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

1812 ms

dot-bg.png

dot-bg.png

1739 ms

smilebg.png

smilebg.png

1838 ms

fclutch.webp

fclutch.webp

1881 ms

fgoogle.webp

fgoogle.webp

1828 ms

fgoodfirms.webp

fgoodfirms.webp

1964 ms

footer-bg-design.png

footer-bg-design.png

1828 ms

lining.png

lining.png

1811 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

1863 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

1862 ms

linked-in.png

linked-in.png

1843 ms

if_Instagram_1298747.png

if_Instagram_1298747.png

1906 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

1755 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

1852 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

1796 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

1801 ms

justin-t.png

justin-t.png

1613 ms

Accessibility Review

webchoiceuk.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webchoiceuk.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webchoiceuk.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webchoiceuk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webchoiceuk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webchoiceuk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Choice UK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: