Tools & Wizards About Us
webcreating.be screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

webcreating.be

Xenius - Beter zakendoen door een overstap naar de cloud

Page Load Speed

13.8 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

9.6 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

webcreating.be screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webcreating.be homepage info - get ready to check Webcreating best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about webcreating.be

Xenius is een expert in cloudoplossingen & hosting voor zelfstandigen en KMO's. Xenius biedt kwalitatieve enterprise producten aan tegen betaalbare prijzen.

Visit webcreating.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Webcreating.be page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webcreating.be performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,890 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.369

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.xenius.be

1240 ms

formidableforms.css

1566 ms

styles.css

1540 ms

frontend-render.css

1640 ms

style.css

1520 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Webcreating.be, 11% (9 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Js.hsforms.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.4 sec) relates to the external source Xenius.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.0 kB (22%)

Content Size

626.6 kB

After Optimization

487.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webcreating.be main page is 626.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 297.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

  • Original 117.8 kB
  • After minification 108.6 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 297.8 kB
  • After minification 256.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webcreating needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 119.6 kB
  • After minification 119.5 kB
  • After compression 115.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 91.5 kB
  • After minification 91.5 kB
  • After compression 86.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webcreating.be has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (69%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webcreating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.xenius.be

www.xenius.be

1240 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

1566 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1540 ms

frontend-render.css

frontend-render.css

1640 ms

style.css

style.css

1520 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

bootstrap-grid.min.css

1524 ms

reset.css

reset.css

1497 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

1921 ms

lf.css

lf.css

1963 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

222 ms

all.css

all.css

304 ms

slick.css

slick.css

248 ms

all.css

all.css

350 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

2002 ms

minimal.css

minimal.css

2016 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

390 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2138 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2130 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

2315 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

250 ms

slick.js

slick.js

2356 ms

cta-variation.js

cta-variation.js

2091 ms

inboundAnalytics.min.js

inboundAnalytics.min.js

2092 ms

4767535.js

4767535.js

271 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

2119 ms

shell.js

shell.js

258 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

2119 ms

index.js

index.js

2592 ms

index.js

index.js

2592 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

2737 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

2590 ms

main.js

main.js

2862 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

2912 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

3577 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

11 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

22 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

63 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

377 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

311 ms

xenius-logo.png

xenius-logo.png

311 ms

www.xenius.be

www.xenius.be

1545 ms

stars.svg

stars.svg

1483 ms

home-service-image-1.png

home-service-image-1.png

429 ms

home-service-image-2.png

home-service-image-2.png

598 ms

why_us_image.png

why_us_image.png

1533 ms

simple-image.png

simple-image.png

1533 ms

xenius-logo-footer.png

xenius-logo-footer.png

1140 ms

location-icon.png

location-icon.png

1541 ms

phone-icon.png

phone-icon.png

1539 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

1540 ms

4767535.js

4767535.js

590 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

503 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

471 ms

fb.js

fb.js

505 ms

4767535.js

4767535.js

589 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

503 ms

SFProDisplay-Bold.woff

SFProDisplay-Bold.woff

3840 ms

SFProDisplay-Regular.woff

SFProDisplay-Regular.woff

5436 ms

SFProDisplay-Heavy.woff

SFProDisplay-Heavy.woff

5364 ms

SFProDisplay-Medium.woff

SFProDisplay-Medium.woff

3925 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

331 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

280 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

365 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

480 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

993 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

279 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3077 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1112 ms

json

json

1161 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1131 ms

8gv5net245

8gv5net245

1140 ms

js

js

221 ms

json

json

147 ms

collect

collect

59 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

213 ms

enterprise.js

enterprise.js

186 ms

collect

collect

240 ms

sproket.png

sproket.png

57 ms

recaptcha__de.js

recaptcha__de.js

46 ms

shell-recaptcha

shell-recaptcha

76 ms

counters.gif

counters.gif

85 ms

enterprise.js

enterprise.js

19 ms

c.gif

c.gif

37 ms

Accessibility Review

webcreating.be accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webcreating.be best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webcreating.be SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webcreating.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webcreating.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webcreating.be

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webcreating. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: