Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesign-norfolk.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

Web Design Norfolk - Web design in Diss, Harleston, Thetford & Bungay

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

626 ms

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webdesign-norfolk.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Web Design Norfolk best content right away, or after learning these important things about webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

Web Design Norfolk - Websites that work, bringing new clients to your business. In Harleston, Diss, Thetford, Bungay & Long Stratton - Call 01379 851216

Visit webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

1624 ms

css

27 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

93 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

185 ms

style.min.css

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 142.1 kB

  • Original 174.9 kB
  • After minification 149.3 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 44.7 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Norfolk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 261.8 kB
  • After minification 261.8 kB
  • After compression 249.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 116.7 kB
  • After minification 116.7 kB
  • After compression 112.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (49%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Norfolk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

1624 ms

css

css

27 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

93 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

185 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

275 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

272 ms

styles.css

styles.css

277 ms

settings.css

settings.css

278 ms

form-themes.css

form-themes.css

277 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

278 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

446 ms

royalslider.css

royalslider.css

365 ms

rs-custom.css

rs-custom.css

365 ms

slick.css

slick.css

367 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

371 ms

business-website-pro.css

business-website-pro.css

370 ms

style_front.css

style_front.css

451 ms

style.css

style.css

455 ms

font-libre-franklin.css

font-libre-franklin.css

471 ms

style.css

style.css

554 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

473 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

621 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

536 ms

wp-customer-reviews.js

wp-customer-reviews.js

542 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

652 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

571 ms

index.js

index.js

632 ms

index.js

index.js

631 ms

global.js

global.js

638 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

772 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

773 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

773 ms

easing.js

easing.js

774 ms

superfish-menu.js

superfish-menu.js

775 ms

custom.js

custom.js

774 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

775 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

811 ms

jquery.royalslider.min.js

jquery.royalslider.min.js

811 ms

bootstrap-gridex.min.js

bootstrap-gridex.min.js

728 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

637 ms

validation.js

validation.js

590 ms

custom-front.js

custom-front.js

587 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

392 ms

new-bg.jpg

new-bg.jpg

431 ms

arrow-orange-clear.png

arrow-orange-clear.png

392 ms

222.jpg

222.jpg

391 ms

norfolk.jpg

norfolk.jpg

430 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

430 ms

anglina.jpg

anglina.jpg

561 ms

fork.jpg

fork.jpg

648 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

643 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

674 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

673 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

673 ms

p7.jpg

p7.jpg

733 ms

p8.jpg

p8.jpg

734 ms

p9.jpg

p9.jpg

754 ms

p10.jpg

p10.jpg

822 ms

p11.jpg

p11.jpg

755 ms

p12.jpg

p12.jpg

840 ms

p14.jpg

p14.jpg

830 ms

p16.jpg

p16.jpg

827 ms

p17.jpg

p17.jpg

832 ms

p19.jpg

p19.jpg

851 ms

p21.jpg

p21.jpg

817 ms

p22.jpg

p22.jpg

821 ms

p113.jpg

p113.jpg

830 ms

521.jpg

521.jpg

831 ms

t2_new.jpg

t2_new.jpg

840 ms

p22-1.jpg

p22-1.jpg

848 ms

p23.jpg

p23.jpg

903 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

17 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

26 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

48 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

875 ms

t1_new.jpg

t1_new.jpg

890 ms

tp-people.jpg

tp-people.jpg

890 ms

star.jpg

star.jpg

903 ms

google.jpg

google.jpg

901 ms

newstars.png

newstars.png

906 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

207 ms

inspectlet.js

inspectlet.js

254 ms

horizontal-arrow-w.png

horizontal-arrow-w.png

729 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

791 ms

norfolk-100x100.jpg

norfolk-100x100.jpg

711 ms

fb-art-100x100.png

fb-art-100x100.png

718 ms

IMG_7140-100x100.jpg

IMG_7140-100x100.jpg

726 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

Yellowpagesisdead-100x100.jpg

Yellowpagesisdead-100x100.jpg

703 ms

js

js

84 ms

995334062

995334062

113 ms

pdata

pdata

17 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesign-norfolk.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesign-norfolk.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Design Norfolk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: