4.3 sec in total
325 ms
2.5 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to webdesign.digital homepage info - get ready to check Web Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about webdesign.digital
Web design in Derby and Matlock. We specialise in the production & promotion of beautiful websites that rank on Google.
Visit webdesign.digitalWe analyzed Webdesign.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
webdesign.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
325 ms
432 ms
12 ms
83 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesign.digital, 10% (3 requests) were made to and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (432 ms) belongs to the original domain Webdesign.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 96.9 kB (12%)
794.3 kB
697.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Webdesign.digital main page is 794.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 573.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 262 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesign.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (41%)
22
13
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webdesign.digital
325 ms
webdesign.digital
432 ms
javascript;base64,V2ViRm9udENvbmZpZz17Z29vZ2xlOntmYW1pbGllczpbIk1vbnRzZXJyYXQ6cmVndWxhciw3MDAmZGlzcGxheT1zd2FwIl19fTtpZih0eXBlb2YgV2ViRm9udD09PSJvYmplY3QiJiZ0eXBlb2YgV2ViRm9udC5sb2FkPT09ImZ1bmN0aW9uIil7V2ViRm9udC5sb2FkKFdlYkZvbnRDb25maWcpfQ==
12 ms
webfontloader.min.js
83 ms
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
8 ms
js
51 ms
javascript;base64,d2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllcj13aW5kb3cuZGF0YUxheWVyfHxbXTtmdW5jdGlvbiBndGFnKCl7ZGF0YUxheWVyLnB1c2goYXJndW1lbnRzKX0KZ3RhZygnc2V0JywnbGlua2VyJyx7ImRvbWFpbnMiOlsid2ViZGVzaWduLmRpZ2l0YWwiXX0pO2d0YWcoImpzIixuZXcgRGF0ZSgpKTtndGFnKCJzZXQiLCJkZXZlbG9wZXJfaWQuZFpUTmlNVCIsITApO2d0YWcoImNvbmZpZyIsIlVBLTUyNTA2NjQ5LTEyIix7ImFub255bWl6ZV9pcCI6ITB9KTtndGFnKCJjb25maWciLCJHLUVWR0o4RDYwQkwiKQ==
4 ms
jquery.min.js
238 ms
299133a13b48b56c4335dbe3caf37868.js
337 ms
css
78 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
js
60 ms
2be31204d0f797226977a1f1533da63c.css
153 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
193 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
194 ms
collect
105 ms
web-design-team-medium.jpg
189 ms
andy-sharon.jpg
189 ms
team-pic.jpg
415 ms
web.png
248 ms
SEO.jpg
338 ms
header.min.css
85 ms
content.min.css
84 ms
footer.min.css
82 ms
logo-web.png
98 ms
sigs.png
91 ms
training-support.jpg
163 ms
bespoke-web-design-2-1024x683.jpg
241 ms
website-design-process-1024x819.jpg
241 ms
webdesign.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
webdesign.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webdesign.digital SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesign.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesign.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webdesign.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: