Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesign.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

webdesign.digital

Web design in Derby & Matlock | Digital Marketing & SEO Experts

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

357 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

webdesign.digital screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webdesign.digital homepage info - get ready to check Web Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about webdesign.digital

Web design in Derby and Matlock. We specialise in the production & promotion of beautiful websites that rank on Google.

Visit webdesign.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesign.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesign.digital performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdesign.digital

357 ms

webdesign.digital

416 ms

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

83 ms

style-blocks-column.css

164 ms

style-blocks-spacer.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesign.digital, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (969 ms) belongs to the original domain Webdesign.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.2 kB (1%)

Content Size

21.5 MB

After Optimization

21.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdesign.digital main page is 21.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 228.3 kB

  • Original 261.6 kB
  • After minification 259.2 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 228.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 21.2 MB
  • After minification 21.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 74.1 kB
  • After compression 73.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 446 B

  • Original 43.0 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesign.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (47%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdesign.digital

webdesign.digital

357 ms

webdesign.digital

webdesign.digital

416 ms

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

83 ms

style-blocks-column.css

style-blocks-column.css

164 ms

style-blocks-spacer.css

style-blocks-spacer.css

241 ms

style-blocks-form.css

style-blocks-form.css

240 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

325 ms

wp-ai-content-generator-public.css

wp-ai-content-generator-public.css

252 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

250 ms

menu-addon.css

menu-addon.css

246 ms

style-blocks-advancedbtn.css

style-blocks-advancedbtn.css

318 ms

style-blocks-postgrid.css

style-blocks-postgrid.css

319 ms

kpt.css

kpt.css

328 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

419 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

339 ms

wp-ai-content-generator-public.js

wp-ai-content-generator-public.js

398 ms

js

js

70 ms

908a842e2413.google-fonts.min.css

908a842e2413.google-fonts.min.css

399 ms

header.min.css

header.min.css

403 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

405 ms

footer.min.css

footer.min.css

524 ms

kb-form-block.min.js

kb-form-block.min.js

538 ms

api.js

api.js

67 ms

wpaicg-form-shortcode.js

wpaicg-form-shortcode.js

537 ms

wpaicg-init.js

wpaicg-init.js

538 ms

wpaicg-chat.js

wpaicg-chat.js

538 ms

navigation.min.js

navigation.min.js

539 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

539 ms

kpt-min.js

kpt-min.js

563 ms

pminstantpage.min.js

pminstantpage.min.js

566 ms

kadence-mega-menu.min.js

kadence-mega-menu.min.js

565 ms

Chatsworth-Web-Design-LOGO.png

Chatsworth-Web-Design-LOGO.png

95 ms

web-design-team.jpg

web-design-team.jpg

351 ms

friar-gate-studios.jpg

friar-gate-studios.jpg

275 ms

sigs.png

sigs.png

172 ms

web-designer-laptop.jpg

web-designer-laptop.jpg

407 ms

website-designers.jpg

website-designers.jpg

451 ms

web-hosting-hp.jpg

web-hosting-hp.jpg

176 ms

friar-gate-studios.jpg

friar-gate-studios.jpg

412 ms

SEO.jpg

SEO.jpg

257 ms

matlock-web-design-seo.jpg

matlock-web-design-seo.jpg

419 ms

computers-in-web-design-office.jpg

computers-in-web-design-office.jpg

439 ms

creative-ideas.jpg

creative-ideas.jpg

517 ms

be46b76b559e70e5ab1dc2a40828280e.png

be46b76b559e70e5ab1dc2a40828280e.png

649 ms

b573f40ede19bf9380d733486474e26e.png

b573f40ede19bf9380d733486474e26e.png

969 ms

website-design-derby.jpg

website-design-derby.jpg

499 ms

b854dd4300ec5122253ddb6fca5b79e0.png

b854dd4300ec5122253ddb6fca5b79e0.png

696 ms

1c95b15ae53ae962d1fe46ca22991aeb.png

1c95b15ae53ae962d1fe46ca22991aeb.png

691 ms

c5f058d94da4c6828a5ebe8d114b0c0d.png

c5f058d94da4c6828a5ebe8d114b0c0d.png

734 ms

83cd272fc8ba03d9049e0836d8629694.png

83cd272fc8ba03d9049e0836d8629694.png

603 ms

db80ad66c3d90c396b8b4044eba0d798.png

db80ad66c3d90c396b8b4044eba0d798.png

657 ms

bb489e7823ac56bffb3da14a628a900e.png

bb489e7823ac56bffb3da14a628a900e.png

780 ms

7b7108252435587025895a060f9bd54c.png

7b7108252435587025895a060f9bd54c.png

750 ms

3cc5fe90c28782d29881d7716e931e08.png

3cc5fe90c28782d29881d7716e931e08.png

857 ms

ec570c2b776d7acad54e52152e89a20f.png

ec570c2b776d7acad54e52152e89a20f.png

796 ms

70cbfdb5c50ca1fe30363a223c014e01.png

70cbfdb5c50ca1fe30363a223c014e01.png

823 ms

c7a67d0aa4a89ab2b511e85303f80599.png

c7a67d0aa4a89ab2b511e85303f80599.png

843 ms

eb1b2a11f6cac087cffb7842adaec2c1.png

eb1b2a11f6cac087cffb7842adaec2c1.png

872 ms

9454d42710b5f5caf88fd58db6458bb9.png

9454d42710b5f5caf88fd58db6458bb9.png

888 ms

2fd1625f3b5c4b2adf10de04b84c4e62.png

2fd1625f3b5c4b2adf10de04b84c4e62.png

919 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesign.digital accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

webdesign.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

webdesign.digital SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesign.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesign.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesign.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: