Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesignadelaide.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

webdesignadelaide.com

Calculating Infinity

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

webdesignadelaide.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webdesignadelaide.com homepage info - get ready to check Webdesignadelaide best content right away, or after learning these important things about webdesignadelaide.com

Visit webdesignadelaide.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesignadelaide.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesignadelaide.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignadelaide.com

1483 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

865 ms

tipsy.css

595 ms

wp-shortcode.css

583 ms

owl.carousel.css

553 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesignadelaide.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Webdesignadelaide.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 307.5 kB (73%)

Content Size

422.4 kB

After Optimization

114.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdesignadelaide.com main page is 422.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 38.8 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 12.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webdesignadelaide needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 169.0 kB

  • Original 244.0 kB
  • After minification 230.1 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 169.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 101.0 kB

  • Original 122.7 kB
  • After minification 95.5 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesignadelaide.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webdesignadelaide. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignadelaide.com

webdesignadelaide.com

1483 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

865 ms

tipsy.css

tipsy.css

595 ms

wp-shortcode.css

wp-shortcode.css

583 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

553 ms

style.css

style.css

1027 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

751 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1565 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

836 ms

jquery.tipsy.js

jquery.tipsy.js

858 ms

wp-shortcode.js

wp-shortcode.js

1000 ms

css

css

24 ms

wp-review.css

wp-review.css

626 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

892 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

907 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

776 ms

contact.js

contact.js

801 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

1203 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1031 ms

jquery.parallax.min.js

jquery.parallax.min.js

1056 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

1203 ms

nobg.png

nobg.png

276 ms

webdesignadelaide.com

webdesignadelaide.com

705 ms

nothumb-538x294.jpg

nothumb-538x294.jpg

290 ms

nothumb-380x380.jpg

nothumb-380x380.jpg

301 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

201 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

202 ms

font-icons.woff

font-icons.woff

289 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

530 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesignadelaide.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webdesignadelaide.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webdesignadelaide.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesignadelaide.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesignadelaide.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesignadelaide.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webdesignadelaide. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: