Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesignchoice.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

webdesignchoice.co.uk

Web Development Company UK | Web Design Company London

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

831 ms

webdesignchoice.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webdesignchoice.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Web Design Choice best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about webdesignchoice.co.uk

Web Choice UK is an award-winning web development and digital marketing company - Giving outstanding results through branding, web design, web development and result oriented SEO and online marketing.

Visit webdesignchoice.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesignchoice.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesignchoice.co.uk performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignchoice.co.uk

28 ms

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

634 ms

js

80 ms

css2

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesignchoice.co.uk, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webdesignchoice.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 299.0 kB (38%)

Content Size

785.3 kB

After Optimization

486.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Webdesignchoice.co.uk main page is 785.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 415.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 290.2 kB

  • Original 369.5 kB
  • After minification 369.5 kB
  • After compression 79.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 290.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 415.8 kB
  • After minification 407.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Choice images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (14%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignchoice.co.uk

webdesignchoice.co.uk

28 ms

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

www.webdesignchoice.co.uk

634 ms

js

js

80 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

default-passive-events

default-passive-events

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

30 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

42 ms

js

js

48 ms

default-passive-events@2.0.0

default-passive-events@2.0.0

12 ms

index.umd.js

index.umd.js

11 ms

1.JiBnMqyl6S.gif

1.JiBnMqyl6S.gif

319 ms

10f9f144-3e6b-4812-9473-d678e335cb75.js

10f9f144-3e6b-4812-9473-d678e335cb75.js

172 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

151 ms

banner_new1.jpg

banner_new1.jpg

537 ms

banner_new1.jpg

banner_new1.jpg

540 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

459 ms

bg-shadow.png

bg-shadow.png

460 ms

middle-hang-bg.png

middle-hang-bg.png

465 ms

justin-t.png

justin-t.png

764 ms

star-black.png

star-black.png

778 ms

Porter.webp

Porter.webp

776 ms

acb.png

acb.png

791 ms

Jason.png

Jason.png

855 ms

139586233_3697726480264211_3966676152453267698_n.jpg

139586233_3697726480264211_3966676152453267698_n.jpg

855 ms

jan.webp

jan.webp

1079 ms

jkdoors-logo.webp

jkdoors-logo.webp

1092 ms

responsive-design-bg-2.png

responsive-design-bg-2.png

1333 ms

code-icon.png

code-icon.png

1110 ms

FluidDesign.png

FluidDesign.png

1166 ms

UI-UX.png

UI-UX.png

1167 ms

blog-icon.png

blog-icon.png

1397 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

1531 ms

dot-bg.png

dot-bg.png

1421 ms

smilebg.png

smilebg.png

1485 ms

footer-bg-design.png

footer-bg-design.png

1554 ms

lining.png

lining.png

1663 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

1711 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

1737 ms

linked-in.png

linked-in.png

1849 ms

if_Instagram_1298747.png

if_Instagram_1298747.png

1836 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

1872 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

1977 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

24 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

51 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

66 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

1902 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

1917 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

108 ms

kenwood-logo4.webp

kenwood-logo4.webp

1872 ms

zesty.webp

zesty.webp

1878 ms

xcitizen4.webp

xcitizen4.webp

1917 ms

xuniversal4.webp

xuniversal4.webp

2010 ms

MEDDICC.webp

MEDDICC.webp

2074 ms

justin-t.png

justin-t.png

1749 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesignchoice.co.uk accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webdesignchoice.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webdesignchoice.co.uk SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesignchoice.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesignchoice.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesignchoice.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Design Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: