Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesigningco.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

webdesigningco.in

Web Designing Company In Bangalore

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

958 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

webdesigningco.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webdesigningco.in homepage info - get ready to check Web Designing Co best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about webdesigningco.in

levate your online identity with Web Designing Company – the forefront of innovative web solutions. Our expert team of designers and developers ensures your digital presence reflects excellence. Disco...

Visit webdesigningco.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesigningco.in page load time and found that the first response time was 958 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesigningco.in performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.webdesigningco.in

958 ms

frontend.css

128 ms

styles.css

321 ms

eae.min.css

305 ms

peel.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesigningco.in, 22% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webdesigningco.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 646.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

9.9 MB

After Optimization

9.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdesigningco.in main page is 9.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 159.6 kB

  • Original 183.5 kB
  • After minification 166.5 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 8.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Designing Co images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 161.4 kB

  • Original 393.9 kB
  • After minification 393.9 kB
  • After compression 232.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.4 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 259.7 kB

  • Original 462.3 kB
  • After minification 457.6 kB
  • After compression 202.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesigningco.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 259.7 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (62%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Designing Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.webdesigningco.in

www.webdesigningco.in

958 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

128 ms

styles.css

styles.css

321 ms

eae.min.css

eae.min.css

305 ms

peel.css

peel.css

182 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

184 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

205 ms

vegas.min.css

vegas.min.css

246 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

246 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

316 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

270 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

314 ms

post-1926.css

post-1926.css

314 ms

post-1922.css

post-1922.css

339 ms

post-39.css

post-39.css

369 ms

style.css

style.css

371 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

441 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

385 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

383 ms

line-icons.css

line-icons.css

407 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

433 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

432 ms

loader.css

loader.css

450 ms

default.css

default.css

452 ms

footer.css

footer.css

469 ms

header.css

header.css

668 ms

style.css

style.css

533 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

581 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

595 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

651 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

669 ms

css

css

31 ms

iconHelper.js

iconHelper.js

610 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

666 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

686 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

688 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

666 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

599 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

552 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

557 ms

index.js

index.js

709 ms

index.js

index.js

687 ms

eae.min.js

eae.min.js

650 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

627 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

583 ms

animated-main.min.js

animated-main.min.js

582 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

582 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

579 ms

vegas.min.js

vegas.min.js

579 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

560 ms

main.js

main.js

529 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

527 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

784 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

976 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

759 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

734 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

733 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

721 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1085 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1086 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1069 ms

css2

css2

17 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

1002 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

955 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

839 ms

logo-4.png

logo-4.png

841 ms

about-1.png

about-1.png

972 ms

se-1-1.png

se-1-1.png

891 ms

se-2-1.png

se-2-1.png

891 ms

se-3-1.png

se-3-1.png

891 ms

se-4-1.png

se-4-1.png

892 ms

se-5-1.png

se-5-1.png

891 ms

se-6-1.png

se-6-1.png

953 ms

si-3-1.png

si-3-1.png

890 ms

si-2-1.png

si-2-1.png

886 ms

h-3.png

h-3.png

784 ms

bt-1.png

bt-1.png

842 ms

t-4-1.png

t-4-1.png

786 ms

t-3-1.png

t-3-1.png

843 ms

t-2-1.png

t-2-1.png

839 ms

t-1-1.png

t-1-1.png

840 ms

team-4.png

team-4.png

844 ms

team-1.png

team-1.png

845 ms

team-2.png

team-2.png

905 ms

team-3.png

team-3.png

904 ms

bl-1.png

bl-1.png

901 ms

bl-6.png

bl-6.png

904 ms

sd-2-1.png

sd-2-1.png

906 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

460 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

510 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

511 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

514 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

512 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

512 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

512 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

513 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

516 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

515 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

516 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

514 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

513 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

516 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

517 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

517 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

517 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

518 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

519 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

932 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

517 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

518 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

518 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVF9eL.ttf

520 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tCMPc.ttf

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tCMPc.ttf

520 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

520 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

520 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VF9eL.ttf

521 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVF9eL.ttf

521 ms

bl-2.png

bl-2.png

725 ms

bl-d-3.png

bl-d-3.png

727 ms

bl-d-2.png

bl-d-2.png

726 ms

bl-4.png

bl-4.png

718 ms

bl-3.png

bl-3.png

679 ms

bl-5.png

bl-5.png

502 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

388 ms

gp-grey.png

gp-grey.png

388 ms

bg.png

bg.png

394 ms

bg.png

bg.png

502 ms

vid-in.png

vid-in.png

449 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesigningco.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webdesigningco.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webdesigningco.in SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesigningco.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdesigningco.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesigningco.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Designing Co. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: