Tools & Wizards About Us
webdesignteam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

webdesignteam.com

Custom Website Design by Creative Website Designers of Web Design Team

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

804 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

552 ms

webdesignteam.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webdesignteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Design Team content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webdesignteam.com

We are a team of professionally managed 200+ highly talented creative designers and web developers. We work on static as well as dynamic (Content Management System, Shopping Cart etc.) websites.

Visit webdesignteam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdesignteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 804 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdesignteam.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignteam.com

804 ms

webdesignteam.com

820 ms

www.webdesignteam.com

1247 ms

font-awesome.min.css

209 ms

bootstrap.min.css

422 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Webdesignteam.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.onesignal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Webdesignteam.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdesignteam.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 49.3 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Design Team images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 71.7 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.7 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdesignteam.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (31%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

50

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Design Team. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdesignteam.com

webdesignteam.com

804 ms

webdesignteam.com

webdesignteam.com

820 ms

www.webdesignteam.com

www.webdesignteam.com

1247 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

209 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

422 ms

index.css

index.css

582 ms

style.css

style.css

590 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

593 ms

lightslider.css

lightslider.css

625 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

627 ms

picbox.css

picbox.css

634 ms

uc.js

uc.js

44 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

53 ms

js

js

82 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

35 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

964 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

picbox.js

picbox.js

801 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

800 ms

jquery.filterizr.js

jquery.filterizr.js

1034 ms

controls.js

controls.js

830 ms

lightslider.js

lightslider.js

839 ms

portfolio1.jpg

portfolio1.jpg

747 ms

home-banner.png

home-banner.png

948 ms

yellow-glow-bkg.png

yellow-glow-bkg.png

1030 ms

srvs-pic-lrg.png

srvs-pic-lrg.png

1441 ms

yellow-bkg.png

yellow-bkg.png

716 ms

testimonial-bkg.png

testimonial-bkg.png

1021 ms

footer-str-img1.png

footer-str-img1.png

911 ms

portfolio2.jpg

portfolio2.jpg

944 ms

portfolio3.jpg

portfolio3.jpg

1106 ms

portfolio4.jpg

portfolio4.jpg

1143 ms

portfolio5.jpg

portfolio5.jpg

1147 ms

portfolio6.jpg

portfolio6.jpg

1229 ms

portfolio7.jpg

portfolio7.jpg

1238 ms

portfolio8.jpg

portfolio8.jpg

1300 ms

portfolio9.jpg

portfolio9.jpg

1338 ms

portfolio10.jpg

portfolio10.jpg

1345 ms

portfolio11.jpg

portfolio11.jpg

1439 ms

portfolio12.jpg

portfolio12.jpg

1447 ms

portfolio13.jpg

portfolio13.jpg

1495 ms

portfolio14.jpg

portfolio14.jpg

1535 ms

portfolio15.jpg

portfolio15.jpg

1542 ms

portfolio16.jpg

portfolio16.jpg

1646 ms

portfolio17.jpg

portfolio17.jpg

1648 ms

portfolio18.jpg

portfolio18.jpg

1656 ms

portfolio19.jpg

portfolio19.jpg

1686 ms

portfolio20.jpg

portfolio20.jpg

1731 ms

web-logo.png

web-logo.png

1740 ms

team-mmbrs-icon.png

team-mmbrs-icon.png

1853 ms

satisfied-client-icon.png

satisfied-client-icon.png

1853 ms

years-business-icon.png

years-business-icon.png

1841 ms

sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff

sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff

1718 ms

Raleway_gdi.woff

Raleway_gdi.woff

1765 ms

lato-heavy-webfont.woff

lato-heavy-webfont.woff

1749 ms

sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff

sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff

1860 ms

sourcesanspro-light-webfont.woff

sourcesanspro-light-webfont.woff

1725 ms

Raleway-Bold_gdi.woff

Raleway-Bold_gdi.woff

1642 ms

Raleway-Light_gdi.woff

Raleway-Light_gdi.woff

1942 ms

droidserif-italic-webfont.woff

droidserif-italic-webfont.woff

1384 ms

jennasue-webfont.woff

jennasue-webfont.woff

1237 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1327 ms

design-created-icon.png

design-created-icon.png

1322 ms

benifits-icon1.png

benifits-icon1.png

1264 ms

benifits-icon2.png

benifits-icon2.png

1297 ms

benifits-icon3.png

benifits-icon3.png

1835 ms

srvs-icon-01.png

srvs-icon-01.png

1335 ms

srvs-icon-02.png

srvs-icon-02.png

1332 ms

srvs-icon-03.png

srvs-icon-03.png

1261 ms

srvs-icon-04.png

srvs-icon-04.png

1284 ms

client.png

client.png

1386 ms

hdng-crve-img.png

hdng-crve-img.png

1346 ms

tv.png

tv.png

1562 ms

why-us-icon-01.png

why-us-icon-01.png

1279 ms

why-us-icon-02.png

why-us-icon-02.png

1412 ms

why-us-icon-03.png

why-us-icon-03.png

1444 ms

why-us-icon-04.png

why-us-icon-04.png

1398 ms

why-us-icon-05.png

why-us-icon-05.png

1379 ms

zoom.png

zoom.png

1503 ms

appo1.png

appo1.png

1451 ms

appo2.png

appo2.png

1451 ms

footer-str-img2.png

footer-str-img2.png

1460 ms

contact-img.png

contact-img.png

1424 ms

top.png

top.png

1405 ms

controls.png

controls.png

1501 ms

Accessibility Review

webdesignteam.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

webdesignteam.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webdesignteam.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdesignteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webdesignteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdesignteam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Design Team. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: