Tools & Wizards About Us
webdetailer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

webdetailer.com

Web Design and Website Development Services - Web Detailer Website design company - Raleigh NC

Page Load Speed

300 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

134 ms

Page Rendered

134 ms

webdetailer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webdetailer.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Detailer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webdetailer.com

Web Detailer is a full service website design and development company in Raleigh, NC. We provide custom website design and development, highly effective internet marketing services, and internet and i...

Visit webdetailer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdetailer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 268 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdetailer.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdetailer.com

32 ms

webdetailer.com

34 ms

style2.css

3 ms

swissarmy.js

7 ms

js

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Webdetailer.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (57 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

439.4 kB

After Optimization

405.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdetailer.com main page is 439.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 11.7 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 399.5 kB
  • After minification 396.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Detailer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdetailer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Detailer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webdetailer.com

webdetailer.com

32 ms

webdetailer.com

webdetailer.com

34 ms

style2.css

style2.css

3 ms

swissarmy.js

swissarmy.js

7 ms

js

js

57 ms

bg-main.gif

bg-main.gif

3 ms

bg-head.gif

bg-head.gif

37 ms

headlogo-web-detailer.gif

headlogo-web-detailer.gif

5 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

6 ms

bg-graphic.png

bg-graphic.png

35 ms

bg-projects.png

bg-projects.png

7 ms

bg-content.gif

bg-content.gif

7 ms

bg-content-shade.gif

bg-content-shade.gif

7 ms

project-history.png

project-history.png

7 ms

exp-nceent.gif

exp-nceent.gif

8 ms

Accessibility Review

webdetailer.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

webdetailer.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

webdetailer.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdetailer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdetailer.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdetailer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Detailer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: