3.3 sec in total
215 ms
1.6 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Webdevelopment content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webdevelopment.us
Iteck - Multi-Purpose HTML5 Template
Visit webdevelopment.usWe analyzed Webdevelopment.us page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
webdevelopment.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
76/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value400 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
66/100
10%
215 ms
260 ms
169 ms
156 ms
225 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Webdevelopment.us, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) belongs to the original domain Webdevelopment.us.
Page size can be reduced by 204.8 kB (24%)
851.9 kB
647.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Webdevelopment.us main page is 851.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 357.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.6 kB, which is 52% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webdevelopment needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 57.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdevelopment.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (38%)
85
53
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webdevelopment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webdevelopment.us
215 ms
webdevelopment.us
260 ms
style.css
169 ms
main.css
156 ms
all.min.css
225 ms
bootstrap.min.css
213 ms
logo_lgr.png
156 ms
3d_vector_head8.svg
275 ms
syb_icon2_2.png
207 ms
44.webp
207 ms
45.webp
288 ms
46.webp
371 ms
25.png
373 ms
26.png
374 ms
27.png
376 ms
28.png
377 ms
29.png
378 ms
cyb_icon.png
379 ms
3d_vector2.svg
388 ms
icon3.svg
380 ms
cs1.png
382 ms
cs2.png
383 ms
cs3.png
384 ms
embed
420 ms
seal.js
102 ms
animate.css
380 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
409 ms
lity.css
415 ms
swiper.min.css
416 ms
css2
62 ms
js
95 ms
jquery-3.0.0.min.js
419 ms
jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js
420 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
421 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
570 ms
wow.min.js
489 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
490 ms
lity.js
568 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
570 ms
jquery.counterup.js
568 ms
pace.js
569 ms
scrollIt.min.js
566 ms
mixitup.min.js
433 ms
main.js
429 ms
swiper.min.js
405 ms
success-summary-img.png
422 ms
3d_vector1.svg
381 ms
cs4.png
363 ms
cs5.png
342 ms
cs6.png
343 ms
logo-home8-icon.webp
262 ms
01.webp
261 ms
05.webp
259 ms
03.webp
349 ms
04.webp
425 ms
02.webp
425 ms
06.webp
424 ms
num8-circle.webp
419 ms
8.png
419 ms
9.png
418 ms
10.png
506 ms
11.png
502 ms
7.png
475 ms
about.webp
472 ms
fa-light-300.woff
637 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
632 ms
js
155 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
582 ms
ab1.webp
477 ms
58.webp
478 ms
ker.webp
531 ms
secure90x72.gif
142 ms
ab2.webp
459 ms
54.webp
384 ms
aq.webp
476 ms
ab3.webp
475 ms
55.webp
477 ms
by.webp
534 ms
ab4.webp
514 ms
56.webp
515 ms
yu.webp
513 ms
ab5.webp
512 ms
57.webp
518 ms
qout8.png
504 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
108 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
185 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf
222 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf
227 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf
225 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
226 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
224 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf
222 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf
227 ms
top_nav_s4.png
501 ms
search.js
13 ms
geometry.js
21 ms
main.js
27 ms
header8_pattern.svg
498 ms
serv8_back.webp
504 ms
webdevelopment.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webdevelopment.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webdevelopment.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdevelopment.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdevelopment.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webdevelopment.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webdevelopment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: