Tools & Wizards About Us
webdevelopment.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

webdevelopment.us

iGenii

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

webdevelopment.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webdevelopment content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webdevelopment.us

Iteck - Multi-Purpose HTML5 Template

Visit webdevelopment.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Webdevelopment.us page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webdevelopment.us performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webdevelopment.us

215 ms

webdevelopment.us

260 ms

style.css

169 ms

main.css

156 ms

all.min.css

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Webdevelopment.us, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) belongs to the original domain Webdevelopment.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

852.5 kB

After Optimization

647.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webdevelopment.us main page is 852.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 357.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 65.3 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.6 kB, which is 52% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 256.1 kB
  • After minification 224.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webdevelopment needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

  • Original 357.7 kB
  • After minification 357.7 kB
  • After compression 299.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 57.5 kB

  • Original 173.4 kB
  • After minification 173.4 kB
  • After compression 116.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webdevelopment.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (38%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

53

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webdevelopment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webdevelopment.us

webdevelopment.us

215 ms

webdevelopment.us

webdevelopment.us

260 ms

style.css

style.css

169 ms

main.css

main.css

156 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

225 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

213 ms

logo_lgr.png

logo_lgr.png

156 ms

3d_vector_head8.svg

3d_vector_head8.svg

275 ms

syb_icon2_2.png

syb_icon2_2.png

207 ms

44.webp

44.webp

207 ms

45.webp

45.webp

288 ms

46.webp

46.webp

371 ms

25.png

25.png

373 ms

26.png

26.png

374 ms

27.png

27.png

376 ms

28.png

28.png

377 ms

29.png

29.png

378 ms

cyb_icon.png

cyb_icon.png

379 ms

3d_vector2.svg

3d_vector2.svg

388 ms

icon3.svg

icon3.svg

380 ms

cs1.png

cs1.png

382 ms

cs2.png

cs2.png

383 ms

cs3.png

cs3.png

384 ms

embed

embed

420 ms

seal.js

seal.js

102 ms

animate.css

animate.css

380 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

409 ms

lity.css

lity.css

415 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

416 ms

css2

css2

62 ms

js

js

95 ms

jquery-3.0.0.min.js

jquery-3.0.0.min.js

419 ms

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

420 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

421 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

570 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

489 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

490 ms

lity.js

lity.js

568 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

570 ms

jquery.counterup.js

jquery.counterup.js

568 ms

pace.js

pace.js

569 ms

scrollIt.min.js

scrollIt.min.js

566 ms

mixitup.min.js

mixitup.min.js

433 ms

main.js

main.js

429 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

405 ms

success-summary-img.png

success-summary-img.png

422 ms

3d_vector1.svg

3d_vector1.svg

381 ms

cs4.png

cs4.png

363 ms

cs5.png

cs5.png

342 ms

cs6.png

cs6.png

343 ms

logo-home8-icon.webp

logo-home8-icon.webp

262 ms

01.webp

01.webp

261 ms

05.webp

05.webp

259 ms

03.webp

03.webp

349 ms

04.webp

04.webp

425 ms

02.webp

02.webp

425 ms

06.webp

06.webp

424 ms

num8-circle.webp

num8-circle.webp

419 ms

8.png

8.png

419 ms

9.png

9.png

418 ms

10.png

10.png

506 ms

11.png

11.png

502 ms

7.png

7.png

475 ms

about.webp

about.webp

472 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

637 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

632 ms

js

js

155 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

582 ms

ab1.webp

ab1.webp

477 ms

58.webp

58.webp

478 ms

ker.webp

ker.webp

531 ms

secure90x72.gif

secure90x72.gif

142 ms

ab2.webp

ab2.webp

459 ms

54.webp

54.webp

384 ms

aq.webp

aq.webp

476 ms

ab3.webp

ab3.webp

475 ms

55.webp

55.webp

477 ms

by.webp

by.webp

534 ms

ab4.webp

ab4.webp

514 ms

56.webp

56.webp

515 ms

yu.webp

yu.webp

513 ms

ab5.webp

ab5.webp

512 ms

57.webp

57.webp

518 ms

qout8.png

qout8.png

504 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

108 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

185 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

222 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

227 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

225 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

226 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

224 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

222 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

227 ms

top_nav_s4.png

top_nav_s4.png

501 ms

search.js

search.js

13 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

21 ms

main.js

main.js

27 ms

header8_pattern.svg

header8_pattern.svg

498 ms

serv8_back.webp

serv8_back.webp

504 ms

Accessibility Review

webdevelopment.us accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webdevelopment.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webdevelopment.us SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webdevelopment.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webdevelopment.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webdevelopment.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webdevelopment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: