5.2 sec in total
692 ms
4.1 sec
343 ms
Click here to check amazing WebFX content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webfx.com
We've generated over $10 billion in revenue for our clients. Read over 1,100 client reviews and learn why WebFX is the #1 digital marketing agency.
Visit webfx.comWe analyzed Webfx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 692 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
webfx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value3.1 s
92/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value3.4 s
93/100
10%
692 ms
76 ms
38 ms
198 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Webfx.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain Webfx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (65%)
2.0 MB
689.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Webfx.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 771.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WebFX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 537.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 537.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 682.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webfx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 682.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (67%)
90
30
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WebFX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.webfx.com
692 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
76 ms
css
38 ms
bootstrap.css
198 ms
font-awesome.css
124 ms
owl.carousel.css
79 ms
owl.theme.css
79 ms
magnific-popup.css
88 ms
jquery.isotope.css
111 ms
nivo-slider.css
114 ms
default.css
121 ms
component.css
127 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
146 ms
theme.css
219 ms
theme-elements.css
227 ms
theme-animate.css
204 ms
theme-blog.css
157 ms
theme-spyropress.css
183 ms
orange.css
205 ms
theme-responsive.css
223 ms
style.css
229 ms
custom.css
230 ms
dynamic.css
230 ms
css
43 ms
css3_grid_style.css
367 ms
css3_grid_style.css
410 ms
responsive.css
266 ms
settings.css
304 ms
bootstrap.css
422 ms
display_ticket.css
287 ms
public.css
302 ms
support_button.css
323 ms
jquery.js
380 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
344 ms
modernizr.js
358 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
466 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
481 ms
plusone.js
71 ms
ag_script.js
401 ms
plugins.js
392 ms
jquery.easing.js
389 ms
jquery.appear.js
386 ms
bootstrap.js
381 ms
twitter.js
366 ms
owl.carousel.js
423 ms
jquery.flipshow.js
414 ms
magnific-popup.js
414 ms
jquery.validate.js
413 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
392 ms
jquery.knob.js
382 ms
jquery.stellar.js
357 ms
jflickrfeed.js
337 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
419 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
411 ms
jquery.form.min.js
397 ms
contactform-script.js
394 ms
theme.js
394 ms
custom.js
392 ms
core.min.js
394 ms
wp-embed.min.js
394 ms
logo1.png
125 ms
social-sprites.png
126 ms
transparent.png
125 ms
slide-content-monitors.png
150 ms
slide-content-chart.png
151 ms
slide-content-man.png
150 ms
ecommerce-website-design-packages.png
151 ms
small-business-website-design-packages.png
152 ms
ecommerce-web-design-steps.png
151 ms
web-design-company-brochure.png
233 ms
home-concept-item-1.png
233 ms
web-designing-250x250-150x150.jpg
233 ms
home-concept-item-3.png
233 ms
project-home3-e1401385146304.jpg
233 ms
project-home2-350x350.jpg
234 ms
project-home1-350x350.jpg
235 ms
logo-footer.png
235 ms
home-concept.png
208 ms
home-concept-icons.png
207 ms
home-concept-item.png
208 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
75 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
76 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
199 ms
clhLqOv7MXn459PTh0gXYBayoCksK7A5ZWkzVNukUdQ.ttf
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
ga.js
27 ms
ax.pl
272 ms
piwik.js
225 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
timer.png
39 ms
loader.gif
41 ms
bullet.png
52 ms
large_left.png
40 ms
large_right.png
52 ms
webfx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webfx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webfx.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webfx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webfx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webfx.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WebFX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: