Tools & Wizards About Us
webhaunt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

webhaunt.com

Web Development Tutorials & Web Developer Resources | Web Haunt

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

175 ms

webhaunt.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webhaunt.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Haunt content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webhaunt.com

PHP Installation and Configuration, web development tutorials, web design tutorials and Payment Gateway tutorials.

Visit webhaunt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webhaunt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webhaunt.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,600 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.135

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webhaunt.com

156 ms

webhaunt.com

4141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

26 ms

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

144 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Webhaunt.com, 20% (16 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webhaunt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.9 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

840.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webhaunt.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 774.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 78.2 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 216.3 kB
  • After minification 200.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Haunt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 151.6 kB

  • Original 774.8 kB
  • After minification 774.8 kB
  • After compression 623.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Haunt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webhaunt.com

webhaunt.com

156 ms

webhaunt.com

webhaunt.com

4141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

26 ms

css

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

144 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

206 ms

js

js

74 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

56 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

99 ms

376 ms

custom.js

custom.js

298 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

17 ms

js

js

127 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

21 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

79 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

52 ms

ads

ads

621 ms

248 ms

ads

ads

471 ms

ads

ads

169 ms

ads

ads

499 ms

ads

ads

502 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

154 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

135 ms

8bcd752ee7f95364bca3d056ccabcf5d.js

8bcd752ee7f95364bca3d056ccabcf5d.js

63 ms

b77b256f0501e7c4881e67f893054266.js

b77b256f0501e7c4881e67f893054266.js

77 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

65 ms

a72dcc203165ce2c2f4a91955ee359ce.js

a72dcc203165ce2c2f4a91955ee359ce.js

90 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

118 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

116 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

164 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

20 ms

d4128ee657a8b8f36370500b7756be30.js

d4128ee657a8b8f36370500b7756be30.js

117 ms

gen_204

gen_204

136 ms

pixel

pixel

86 ms

8964552396074085254

8964552396074085254

342 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

82 ms

omrhp.js

omrhp.js

81 ms

Q12zgMmT.js

Q12zgMmT.js

114 ms

icon.png

icon.png

24 ms

pixel

pixel

70 ms

gen_204

gen_204

325 ms

6990478076655952113

6990478076655952113

353 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

286 ms

14944213133031273137

14944213133031273137

284 ms

pixel

pixel

355 ms

pixel

pixel

354 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

273 ms

62bHydCX.html

62bHydCX.html

219 ms

css

css

158 ms

activeview

activeview

149 ms

MnkYVOJ9Vxy1fW7IbW6uwlgEUewyXabIiklRFbW9srs.js

MnkYVOJ9Vxy1fW7IbW6uwlgEUewyXabIiklRFbW9srs.js

62 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

62 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

62 ms

rum

rum

168 ms

pixel

pixel

156 ms

14293853729117222994

14293853729117222994

150 ms

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

87 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

92 ms

gen_204

gen_204

151 ms

pixel

pixel

144 ms

B31965939.393355372;dc_trk_aid=585290410;dc_trk_cid=214873209;ord=[timestamp];dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;tfua=;gdpr=;gdpr_consent=;ltd=;tpsrc=cis;dc_tdv=1

B31965939.393355372;dc_trk_aid=585290410;dc_trk_cid=214873209;ord=[timestamp];dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;tfua=;gdpr=;gdpr_consent=;ltd=;tpsrc=cis;dc_tdv=1

186 ms

pixel

pixel

138 ms

bounce

bounce

137 ms

3308307796922915518

3308307796922915518

68 ms

gen_204

gen_204

161 ms

activeview

activeview

117 ms

pixel

pixel

106 ms

um

um

102 ms

pixel

pixel

94 ms

pixel

pixel

95 ms

activeview

activeview

106 ms

rum

rum

54 ms

rum

rum

34 ms

um

um

19 ms

pixel

pixel

51 ms

activeview

activeview

76 ms

sd

sd

38 ms

pixel

pixel

35 ms

Accessibility Review

webhaunt.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

webhaunt.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webhaunt.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhaunt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhaunt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhaunt.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Haunt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: