3.1 sec in total
374 ms
2 sec
737 ms
Visit webhostingreviewjam.com now to see the best up-to-date Webhostingreviewjam content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webhostingreviewjam.com
Find affordable and reliable hosts for your business, blog and more. Use our reviews to compare pricing, plans and features of popular hosting plans.
Visit webhostingreviewjam.comWe analyzed Webhostingreviewjam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 374 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
webhostingreviewjam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
374 ms
57 ms
25 ms
35 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostingreviewjam.com, 12% (16 requests) were made to Webhostingjams.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) relates to the external source Webhostingjams.com.
Page size can be reduced by 599.3 kB (26%)
2.3 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Webhostingreviewjam.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webhostingreviewjam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 318.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 318.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhostingreviewjam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (59%)
112
46
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webhostingreviewjam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.webhostingreviewjam.com
374 ms
style.css
57 ms
css
25 ms
css
35 ms
skin.css
74 ms
colorbox.css
76 ms
reveal.css
77 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.css
78 ms
essb-mailform.css
102 ms
layerslider.css
90 ms
common.css
108 ms
selective.css
109 ms
style.css
110 ms
styles.css
109 ms
styles.css
126 ms
settings.css
152 ms
captions.css
145 ms
social_icons_widget.css
145 ms
jquery.js
186 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
145 ms
jquery.reveal.js
163 ms
jquery.cookie.js
181 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
182 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
183 ms
jtwt.js
200 ms
superfish.js
199 ms
jquery.cookie.js
217 ms
scripts.js
218 ms
compat.min.js
218 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery-min.js
221 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
236 ms
frizzly.min.js
252 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
253 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
256 ms
1x2t9h4b
134 ms
jstracker.min.js
10 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
244 ms
comment-reply.min.js
248 ms
essb-mailform.js
264 ms
sf.js
292 ms
sf_selective.js
277 ms
reset.css
240 ms
nivo-slider.css
224 ms
superfish.css
225 ms
custom.css
241 ms
jquery.form.min.js
312 ms
scripts.js
299 ms
wp-embed.min.js
289 ms
index.php
86 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
53 ms
blue-1.png
226 ms
dmca_protected_sml_120m.png
18 ms
pattern4.png
52 ms
header_bg.png
68 ms
header_bg2.png
183 ms
nav_bg.png
53 ms
sf_search.png
52 ms
webhostingreviewjam.png
54 ms
slider-woods.png
329 ms
wood2.png
184 ms
web-hosting-reviews-packages.png
151 ms
green-clouds.png
186 ms
ipage-parachute-files.png
204 ms
affordable-icon21.png
185 ms
reliable-icon1.png
225 ms
Features-icon3.png
227 ms
Support-icon4.png
229 ms
eco-friendly-icon5.png
233 ms
Pinterest-200x120.png
256 ms
how-to-track-your-google-plus-200x120.jpg
256 ms
foobar-WP-590x300-200x120.png
258 ms
download-200x120.jpg
259 ms
ubuntofeature-200x120.jpg
260 ms
Avada1-200x120.jpg
304 ms
Justified-Image-Grid-Gallery-200x120.png
298 ms
Batch-200x120.jpg
299 ms
DailyJournal-200x120.jpg
299 ms
logo.png
300 ms
facebook.jpg
326 ms
googleplus.jpg
329 ms
twitter.jpg
327 ms
youtube.jpg
332 ms
blue-2.png
213 ms
blue-3.png
211 ms
blue-4.png
217 ms
blue-5.png
226 ms
blue-6.png
219 ms
blue-7.png
380 ms
blue-8.png
382 ms
hosting-partner.png
382 ms
gray-check.png
378 ms
web-hosting-featutures.png
388 ms
easy-to-use-tools.png
385 ms
support-icon.png
664 ms
nav_sep.png
346 ms
content_bgs.png
651 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
36 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
36 ms
footer_bg.png
322 ms
footer_widget_title_bg.png
320 ms
Why-Do-You-Need-Web-Hosting.png
622 ms
separator-gray-plain.png
619 ms
separator-with-title.png
620 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
piwik.js
216 ms
blue-3.png
154 ms
blue-2.png
153 ms
blue-4.png
435 ms
blue-1.png
183 ms
blue-6.png
182 ms
blue-5.png
175 ms
track.js
110 ms
gray-check.png
274 ms
blue-7.png
274 ms
hosting-partner.png
273 ms
blue-8.png
272 ms
easy-to-use-tools.png
272 ms
web-hosting-featutures.png
267 ms
blocked_sites.js
246 ms
251 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
142 ms
overlay.png
49 ms
loader.gif
50 ms
timer.png
51 ms
small_left.png
49 ms
small_right.png
48 ms
separator-gray-plain.png
40 ms
separator-with-title.png
78 ms
Why-Do-You-Need-Web-Hosting.png
76 ms
support-icon.png
74 ms
jstracker.content.min.js
4 ms
syndication
107 ms
463459732741554176
174 ms
webhostingreviewjam.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webhostingreviewjam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webhostingreviewjam.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostingreviewjam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Webhostingreviewjam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webhostingreviewjam.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webhostingreviewjam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: