Tools & Wizards About Us
webhostranking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

webhostranking.com

Web Host Ranking- Best Hosting Ratings of Top Web Hosting Providers

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

704 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

webhostranking.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Host Ranking content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webhostranking.com

Best Web Hosting Reviews & Ratings for top web spaces services. Hosting Coupon codes, comparisons. Best WordPress Hosts, Dedicated Servers, & Free Hosts.

Visit webhostranking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webhostranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 704 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webhostranking.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostranking.com

704 ms

webfont.js

22 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

font-awesome.min.css

229 ms

bootstrap.min.css

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostranking.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Webhostranking.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.7 kB (25%)

Content Size

347.5 kB

After Optimization

260.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webhostranking.com main page is 347.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 260.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 29.0 kB

  • Original 260.5 kB
  • After minification 231.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Host Ranking needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (39%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Host Ranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostranking.com

www.webhostranking.com

704 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

22 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

138 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

229 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

264 ms

style.css

style.css

209 ms

css

css

26 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

190 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

274 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

234 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

289 ms

ajax-scripts.js

ajax-scripts.js

290 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

295 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

364 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

370 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

369 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

369 ms

awaken.slider.js

awaken.slider.js

376 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

380 ms

550

550

358 ms

logo-backblaze-big1-388x220.png

logo-backblaze-big1-388x220.png

354 ms

inmotion-hosting-logo1-388x220.jpg

inmotion-hosting-logo1-388x220.jpg

358 ms

3dcart-logo-featured-860x522-388x220.jpg

3dcart-logo-featured-860x522-388x220.jpg

356 ms

ipage-logo-388x220.png

ipage-logo-388x220.png

356 ms

affiliate-program-388x220.jpg

affiliate-program-388x220.jpg

356 ms

bluehost-coupon-388x220.png

bluehost-coupon-388x220.png

357 ms

bh-vs-ip-388x220.jpg

bh-vs-ip-388x220.jpg

356 ms

bh-vs-hg-120x85.jpg

bh-vs-hg-120x85.jpg

357 ms

bh-vs-gd-120x85.jpg

bh-vs-gd-120x85.jpg

358 ms

hg-120x85.jpg

hg-120x85.jpg

357 ms

gd-120x85.jpg

gd-120x85.jpg

358 ms

ip-120x85.jpg

ip-120x85.jpg

358 ms

hn-120x85.jpg

hn-120x85.jpg

358 ms

ehost-screen-388x220.jpg

ehost-screen-388x220.jpg

385 ms

ipage-120x85.jpg

ipage-120x85.jpg

384 ms

BH-120x85.png

BH-120x85.png

358 ms

dh-120x85.png

dh-120x85.png

396 ms

greengeeks-host-review-120x85.jpg

greengeeks-host-review-120x85.jpg

397 ms

just-host-reviews-120x85.jpg

just-host-reviews-120x85.jpg

383 ms

fatcow-large-120x85.png

fatcow-large-120x85.png

415 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

475 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

473 ms

google_plus.png

google_plus.png

489 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf

288 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf

289 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf

289 ms

pFZGRS3ywNfpSqkEIed1Ww.ttf

pFZGRS3ywNfpSqkEIed1Ww.ttf

288 ms

gMhvhm-nVj1086DvGgmzB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

gMhvhm-nVj1086DvGgmzB6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

288 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

620 ms

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsB43XjeME5heavxWqLE69Ro.ttf

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsB43XjeME5heavxWqLE69Ro.ttf

287 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nG9QJ2ZrAngtF2xl-5ukicw.ttf

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nG9QJ2ZrAngtF2xl-5ukicw.ttf

288 ms

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf

288 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

286 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

Accessibility Review

webhostranking.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webhostranking.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webhostranking.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhostranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhostranking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Host Ranking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: