Tools & Wizards About Us
webhostsreview.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

webhostsreview.net

Best web hosting companies reviews | WebHostsReview.net

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

724 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

209 ms

webhostsreview.net screenshot

About Website

Visit webhostsreview.net now to see the best up-to-date Web Hosts Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webhostsreview.net

Get the best web hosting companies reviews! Find out about the top web hosting providers here. Complete website hosting reviews by consumers and our experts.

Visit webhostsreview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webhostsreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 724 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webhostsreview.net performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.113

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostsreview.net

724 ms

style.css

27 ms

style-Green.css

20 ms

myrp-hotlink-css.php

784 ms

jquery.rating.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostsreview.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) belongs to the original domain Webhostsreview.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.2 kB (65%)

Content Size

716.4 kB

After Optimization

251.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webhostsreview.net main page is 716.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 408.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 83.7 kB

  • Original 112.6 kB
  • After minification 110.5 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 38 B

  • Original 56.2 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Hosts Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 271.6 kB

  • Original 408.3 kB
  • After minification 407.4 kB
  • After compression 136.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 109.9 kB

  • Original 139.2 kB
  • After minification 137.1 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhostsreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (64%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Hosts Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.webhostsreview.net

www.webhostsreview.net

724 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

style-Green.css

style-Green.css

20 ms

myrp-hotlink-css.php

myrp-hotlink-css.php

784 ms

jquery.rating.css

jquery.rating.css

18 ms

global.css

global.css

21 ms

autocomplete.css

autocomplete.css

19 ms

sfsi-style.css

sfsi-style.css

38 ms

css

css

48 ms

style.css

style.css

19 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

39 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

40 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

40 ms

page_templates.css

page_templates.css

41 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

44 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

39 ms

myrp-hotlink-js.php

myrp-hotlink-js.php

767 ms

jquery.MetaData.js

jquery.MetaData.js

39 ms

jquery.rating.pack.js

jquery.rating.pack.js

39 ms

jtip.js

jtip.js

39 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

40 ms

install_swiftype.min.js

install_swiftype.min.js

40 ms

tw-sack.min.js

tw-sack.min.js

41 ms

style.css

style.css

346 ms

scb-default.css

scb-default.css

39 ms

scb-ratings.css

scb-ratings.css

40 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

60 ms

platform.js

platform.js

96 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

55 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

23 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

23 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

24 ms

jquery.shuffle.min.js

jquery.shuffle.min.js

25 ms

random-shuffle-min.js

random-shuffle-min.js

25 ms

custom.js

custom.js

30 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

30 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

31 ms

et-ptemplates-frontend.js

et-ptemplates-frontend.js

34 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

34 ms

custom.js

custom.js

37 ms

easing.js

easing.js

48 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

49 ms

ga.js

ga.js

129 ms

bg.png

bg.png

118 ms

logook.png

logook.png

141 ms

1and1hostingtop.gif

1and1hostingtop.gif

128 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

119 ms

nav-top.png

nav-top.png

119 ms

nav-bottom.png

nav-bottom.png

131 ms

1.png

1.png

117 ms

networksolutionslogo.png

networksolutionslogo.png

119 ms

star-green.png

star-green.png

120 ms

2.png

2.png

120 ms

tmdhostinglogo.png

tmdhostinglogo.png

121 ms

3.png

3.png

121 ms

1and1logo.png

1and1logo.png

122 ms

4.png

4.png

123 ms

eleven2logo.png

eleven2logo.png

128 ms

5.png

5.png

124 ms

mochahotslogo.png

mochahotslogo.png

124 ms

6.png

6.png

126 ms

ipagelogo.png

ipagelogo.png

135 ms

7.png

7.png

125 ms

bluehostlogo.png

bluehostlogo.png

126 ms

8.png

8.png

128 ms

webcomlogo.png

webcomlogo.png

129 ms

9.png

9.png

129 ms

hostgatorlogo.png

hostgatorlogo.png

134 ms

10.png

10.png

131 ms

arvixelogo.png

arvixelogo.png

130 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

130 ms

toggle_title.png

toggle_title.png

131 ms

1and1mywebsiebottom.gif

1and1mywebsiebottom.gif

131 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

104 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

94 ms

5M21SdFLkD52QavfmHs6cA.ttf

5M21SdFLkD52QavfmHs6cA.ttf

119 ms

oOeFwZNlrTefzLYmlVV1UKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

oOeFwZNlrTefzLYmlVV1UKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

119 ms

Pru33qjShpZSmG3z6VYwnaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Pru33qjShpZSmG3z6VYwnaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

120 ms

BhNUF0UvSiDyKi5GMZK0cPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

BhNUF0UvSiDyKi5GMZK0cPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

120 ms

97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

120 ms

9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

119 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

410 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

360 ms

cc.js

cc.js

35 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

78 ms

114 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

42 ms

cc

cc

83 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

58 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

122 ms

Accessibility Review

webhostsreview.net accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webhostsreview.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webhostsreview.net SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostsreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhostsreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhostsreview.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Hosts Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: