2.2 sec in total
620 ms
1.4 sec
182 ms
Visit webhostwith.us now to see the best up-to-date Webhostwith content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webhostwith.us
Visit webhostwith.usWe analyzed Webhostwith.us page load time and found that the first response time was 620 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
webhostwith.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
620 ms
420 ms
212 ms
140 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Webhostwith.us, 22% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) belongs to the original domain Webhostwith.us.
Page size can be reduced by 447.5 kB (74%)
601.7 kB
154.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Webhostwith.us main page is 601.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 387.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webhostwith needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 277.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhostwith.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (67%)
12
4
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webhostwith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webhostwith.us
620 ms
bootstrap.min.css
420 ms
font-awesome.min.css
212 ms
overrides.css
140 ms
styles.css
215 ms
jquery.min.js
356 ms
custom.css
137 ms
bootstrap.min.js
303 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
677 ms
whmcs.js
221 ms
css
35 ms
logo.png
83 ms
verifyimage.php
175 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
310 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
44 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
45 ms
webhostwith.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webhostwith.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
webhostwith.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhostwith.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhostwith.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webhostwith.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webhostwith. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: