Tools & Wizards About Us
webhub.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

webhub.in

MediaWiz Interactive - Website & App Development

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

176 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

407 ms

webhub.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webhub.in homepage info - get ready to check Webhub best content right away, or after learning these important things about webhub.in

We've been building websites for 25 years, the sheer advantage of this experience saves you hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars!

Visit webhub.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webhub.in page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webhub.in performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webhub.in

176 ms

www.mediawiz.biz

820 ms

css

31 ms

css

29 ms

jquery.min.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webhub.in, 54% (20 requests) were made to Mediawiz.biz and 38% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) relates to the external source Mediawiz.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.8 kB (16%)

Content Size

776.2 kB

After Optimization

652.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webhub.in main page is 776.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 506.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 123.7 kB

  • Original 149.3 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 506.4 kB
  • After minification 506.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webhub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 105.9 kB
  • After compression 105.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 14.7 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webhub.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (15%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webhub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webhub.in

webhub.in

176 ms

www.mediawiz.biz

www.mediawiz.biz

820 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

120 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

175 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

297 ms

common.js

common.js

184 ms

logo-blue.jpg

logo-blue.jpg

173 ms

cyber-security-13-3.png

cyber-security-13-3.png

466 ms

cyber-security-01.png

cyber-security-01.png

187 ms

cyber-security-icon-2.png

cyber-security-icon-2.png

232 ms

cyber-security-icon-18.png

cyber-security-icon-18.png

233 ms

cyber-security-icon-7.png

cyber-security-icon-7.png

295 ms

cyber-security-14-1.jpg

cyber-security-14-1.jpg

296 ms

cyber-security-14.png

cyber-security-14.png

458 ms

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-08.png

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-08.png

320 ms

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-03.png

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-03.png

329 ms

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-06.png

cyber-security-illustrated-icons-06.png

329 ms

cyber-security-17.png

cyber-security-17.png

318 ms

cyber-security-02.png

cyber-security-02.png

318 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

17 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff

35 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTbMJqM.woff

10 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPTbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPTbMJqM.woff

38 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMJqM.woff

38 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6IvTbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6IvTbMJqM.woff

10 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6zvPbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6zvPbMJqM.woff

37 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMJqM.woff

38 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMJqM.woff

43 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPPbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6fPPbMJqM.woff

44 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PLbMJqM.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PLbMJqM.woff

43 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

116 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

64 ms

Accessibility Review

webhub.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webhub.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webhub.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webhub.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webhub.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webhub.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webhub. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: