Tools & Wizards About Us
webigence.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

webigence.net

ASP.NET Web Development for large Web Applications | Bespoke Technical London Agency

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

445 ms

webigence.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Igence content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webigence.net

Leading ASP.NET London UK web development agency specialising in bespoke and custom programming requirements for large and more technically complex projects

Visit webigence.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webigence.net page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webigence.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webigence.net

41 ms

www.webigence.com

189 ms

www.webigence.com

336 ms

css

35 ms

css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webigence.net, 83% (45 requests) were made to Webigence.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (926 ms) relates to the external source Webigence.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.6 kB (12%)

Content Size

946.3 kB

After Optimization

828.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webigence.net main page is 946.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 694.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 694.1 kB
  • After minification 669.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Igence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 125.5 kB
  • After minification 124.0 kB
  • After compression 90.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 94.3 kB
  • After minification 94.3 kB
  • After compression 63.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webigence.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (46%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Igence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webigence.net

webigence.net

41 ms

www.webigence.com

www.webigence.com

189 ms

www.webigence.com

www.webigence.com

336 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

57 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

171 ms

material.min.css

material.min.css

274 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

322 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

323 ms

style.css

style.css

417 ms

webigence_style.css

webigence_style.css

324 ms

ms-logo.css

ms-logo.css

323 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

364 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

403 ms

material.min.js

material.min.js

401 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

404 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

401 ms

EventEmitter.min.js

EventEmitter.min.js

444 ms

heir.js

heir.js

478 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

480 ms

jquery.ellipsis.js

jquery.ellipsis.js

480 ms

scroller.js

scroller.js

481 ms

validator.js

validator.js

493 ms

functions.js

functions.js

524 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

86 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

83 ms

logo-header@2x.png

logo-header@2x.png

83 ms

intro-home-image.jpg

intro-home-image.jpg

312 ms

logo-large@2x.png

logo-large@2x.png

84 ms

logo-barclaycard.png

logo-barclaycard.png

84 ms

logo-abbey-road-studios.png

logo-abbey-road-studios.png

161 ms

logo-kpmg.png

logo-kpmg.png

162 ms

logo-westminster.png

logo-westminster.png

163 ms

logo-yco.png

logo-yco.png

162 ms

logo-trussel-trust.png

logo-trussel-trust.png

161 ms

img-specialists_anim.gif

img-specialists_anim.gif

926 ms

img-experienced_anim.gif

img-experienced_anim.gif

622 ms

img-reliable_anim.gif

img-reliable_anim.gif

699 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

317 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

394 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

467 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

551 ms

logo-footer@2x.png

logo-footer@2x.png

472 ms

font

font

26 ms

Material-Design-Icons.woff

Material-Design-Icons.woff

547 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

76 ms

peel.jpg

peel.jpg

82 ms

david.jpg

david.jpg

81 ms

andy.jpg

andy.jpg

80 ms

font

font

112 ms

flexslider-icon.woff

flexslider-icon.woff

81 ms

Accessibility Review

webigence.net accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webigence.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webigence.net SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webigence.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webigence.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webigence.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Igence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: