Tools & Wizards About Us
weblifeplus.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

weblifeplus.ru

WLP Бесплатные активаторы Windows и Office

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

735 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

weblifeplus.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Weblifeplus content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about weblifeplus.ru

Рабочие и бесплатные программы активаторы лицензии для Windows различных версий: 11, 10, 8.1, 7, XP и Microsoft Office. Если нужно активировать "Винду" быстро и навсегда).

Visit weblifeplus.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Weblifeplus.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 735 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weblifeplus.ru performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weblifeplus.ru

735 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

83 ms

widget.css

184 ms

lightbox.min.ru_RU.css

168 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Weblifeplus.ru, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to 2.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (735 ms) belongs to the original domain Weblifeplus.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 465.7 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

619.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Weblifeplus.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 704.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 170.7 kB

  • Original 704.3 kB
  • After minification 533.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Weblifeplus needs image optimization as it can save up to 170.7 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 177.8 kB

  • Original 239.7 kB
  • After minification 202.4 kB
  • After compression 61.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 88.0 kB

  • Original 104.5 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weblifeplus.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (42%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weblifeplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

weblifeplus.ru

weblifeplus.ru

735 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

83 ms

widget.css

widget.css

184 ms

lightbox.min.ru_RU.css

lightbox.min.ru_RU.css

168 ms

css

css

25 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

168 ms

style.css

style.css

182 ms

ic_script.js

ic_script.js

182 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

265 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

246 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

247 ms

public.css

public.css

245 ms

dark.css

dark.css

258 ms

wp-lightbox-2.min.js

wp-lightbox-2.min.js

258 ms

flexslider.js

flexslider.js

348 ms

doubletaptogo.js

doubletaptogo.js

347 ms

global.js

global.js

348 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

348 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

347 ms

54b293525dd70953cc02226499e4bbe7

54b293525dd70953cc02226499e4bbe7

79 ms

f7d69c60ddc6ffe81b56ac8ac7c0e6fb

f7d69c60ddc6ffe81b56ac8ac7c0e6fb

250 ms

ece63725b07464eb068753c24eff4b2e

ece63725b07464eb068753c24eff4b2e

252 ms

065dc8395380bd773ff05b8409f90e1c

065dc8395380bd773ff05b8409f90e1c

288 ms

logo.png

logo.png

119 ms

wl.jpg

wl.jpg

251 ms

keys_7-400x200.png

keys_7-400x200.png

356 ms

rel-350x200.jpeg

rel-350x200.jpeg

251 ms

windows-10-key-400x200.jpg

windows-10-key-400x200.jpg

332 ms

kryak.png

kryak.png

340 ms

winda10-400x200.jpg

winda10-400x200.jpg

286 ms

wl-567x243.jpg

wl-567x243.jpg

359 ms

win10_2-700x300.png

win10_2-700x300.png

632 ms

kryak-578x247.png

kryak-578x247.png

625 ms

auto-400x171.jpg

auto-400x171.jpg

417 ms

keys_7-e1455789367664-471x202.png

keys_7-e1455789367664-471x202.png

601 ms

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

30 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

31 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

64 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf

63 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

66 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

489 ms

hit

hit

253 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

299 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

214 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

234 ms

Accessibility Review

weblifeplus.ru accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

weblifeplus.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

weblifeplus.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weblifeplus.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weblifeplus.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

weblifeplus.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Weblifeplus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: