Tools & Wizards About Us
webmailtechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

webmailtechnology.com

Website Designing Services and Web|Software development company in Ahemdabad,Gujarat,India

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

488 ms

webmailtechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Visit webmailtechnology.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Mailtechnology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmailtechnology.com

solution and IT services company which help the end user to experience and achieve complet digital transformation.We hold customer until he is satisfied.We believe in repeat business only.

Visit webmailtechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmailtechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmailtechnology.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

webmailtechnology.com

410 ms

webmailtechnology.com

420 ms

adsbygoogle.js

105 ms

style.css

97 ms

style1.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Webmailtechnology.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Webmailtechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

292.8 kB

After Optimization

243.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webmailtechnology.com main page is 292.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 230.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 49.9 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 230.4 kB
  • After minification 230.4 kB
  • After compression 230.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (35%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

54

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Mailtechnology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmailtechnology.com

webmailtechnology.com

410 ms

webmailtechnology.com

webmailtechnology.com

420 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

105 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

style1.css

style1.css

193 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

401 ms

linecons.css

linecons.css

286 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

287 ms

responsive1.css

responsive1.css

288 ms

animate.css

animate.css

292 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

295 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

404 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

480 ms

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

478 ms

cycle.min.js

cycle.min.js

405 ms

jquery.1.8.3.min.js

jquery.1.8.3.min.js

495 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

475 ms

jquery-scrolltofixed.js

jquery-scrolltofixed.js

474 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

493 ms

jquery.isotope.js

jquery.isotope.js

570 ms

wow.js

wow.js

576 ms

classie.js

classie.js

577 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

577 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

578 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

663 ms

owl_code.js

owl_code.js

667 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

233 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

18 ms

logo.JPG

logo.JPG

215 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

292 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

292 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

294 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

293 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

440 ms

prev.png

prev.png

300 ms

next.png

next.png

392 ms

blogger-brands.svg

blogger-brands.svg

385 ms

facebook-square-brands.svg

facebook-square-brands.svg

393 ms

twitter-square-brands.svg

twitter-square-brands.svg

394 ms

youtube-brands.svg

youtube-brands.svg

418 ms

upwork-tile.svg

upwork-tile.svg

489 ms

fiverr.svg

fiverr.svg

518 ms

linkedin-brands.svg

linkedin-brands.svg

491 ms

instagram-brands.svg

instagram-brands.svg

520 ms

Google__G__Logo.svg

Google__G__Logo.svg

516 ms

favicon.png

favicon.png

535 ms

graphic%20design.png

graphic%20design.png

594 ms

website%20devlopment.png

website%20devlopment.png

594 ms

softwate%20devlopment.png

softwate%20devlopment.png

707 ms

seo%20devlopment.png

seo%20devlopment.png

614 ms

javascript.png

javascript.png

614 ms

android.png

android.png

628 ms

aspnet.png

aspnet.png

693 ms

java.png

java.png

692 ms

Joomla.png

Joomla.png

720 ms

wprdpress.png

wprdpress.png

720 ms

Magento.png

Magento.png

733 ms

DRUPAL.png

DRUPAL.png

801 ms

p1.jpg

p1.jpg

800 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

806 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

820 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

765 ms

dosis-bold.woff

dosis-bold.woff

770 ms

lato-regular.woff

lato-regular.woff

776 ms

ads

ads

26 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

701 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

623 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

646 ms

p7.jpg

p7.jpg

645 ms

zoom.png

zoom.png

646 ms

p15.jpg

p15.jpg

704 ms

p16.jpg

p16.jpg

711 ms

a3.jpg

a3.jpg

614 ms

a1.jpg

a1.jpg

626 ms

a2.jpg

a2.jpg

629 ms

p10.jpg

p10.jpg

607 ms

p9.jpg

p9.jpg

661 ms

p8.jpg

p8.jpg

614 ms

c1.jpg

c1.jpg

626 ms

c2.jpg

c2.jpg

603 ms

c3.jpg

c3.jpg

602 ms

c4.jpg

c4.jpg

678 ms

c5.jpg

c5.jpg

661 ms

sumit.PNG

sumit.PNG

609 ms

pattern_bg.jpg

pattern_bg.jpg

618 ms

office%20logo.png

office%20logo.png

604 ms

map-marker-alt-solid.svg

map-marker-alt-solid.svg

603 ms

CONTACT.png

CONTACT.png

758 ms

whatsapp-square-brands.svg

whatsapp-square-brands.svg

600 ms

mail.png

mail.png

607 ms

SEO Factors

webmailtechnology.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmailtechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webmailtechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmailtechnology.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Mailtechnology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: