Tools & Wizards About Us
webmaker.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

webmaker.in

SAM Softech - Web Design Company Patna | Website Development Companies Patna Bihar | Digital Marketing Company Patna | e commerce website developer pa...

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

8.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

webmaker.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Maker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmaker.in

SAM Softech #1 web design company in Patna that offers the best web development and design services in Patna with most innovative approach, SAM Softech is a Digital Agency that specializes in website ...

Visit webmaker.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmaker.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmaker.in performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,460 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.155

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmaker.in

1418 ms

css2

57 ms

bootstrap.min.css

988 ms

plugin.min.css

807 ms

swiper.min.css

853 ms

Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (107 requests) were addressed to the original Webmaker.in, 3% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmaker.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (35%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webmaker.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 88.6 kB

  • Original 103.8 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 935.8 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Maker needs image optimization as it can save up to 935.8 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 358.6 kB
  • After minification 358.6 kB
  • After compression 357.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 83.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmaker.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (23%)

Requests Now

127

After Optimization

98

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 127 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Maker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmaker.in

webmaker.in

1418 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

988 ms

plugin.min.css

plugin.min.css

807 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

853 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

868 ms

style.css

style.css

1596 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

930 ms

darkmode.css

darkmode.css

1001 ms

toastr.css

toastr.css

47 ms

sweetalert2.min.css

sweetalert2.min.css

55 ms

api.js

api.js

66 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

52 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

1058 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1289 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

1372 ms

plugin.min.js

plugin.min.js

1381 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1397 ms

preloader.js

preloader.js

1273 ms

dark-mode.js

dark-mode.js

1481 ms

main.js

main.js

1499 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

53 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

57 ms

sweetalert2.min.js

sweetalert2.min.js

63 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

56 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

67 ms

sweetalert.min.js

sweetalert.min.js

56 ms

coustonValidate.js

coustonValidate.js

1840 ms

sweetalert.min.js

sweetalert.min.js

16 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

336 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

418 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

403 ms

logo.png

logo.png

404 ms

footer-wave.svg

footer-wave.svg

1260 ms

call.svg

call.svg

406 ms

whatsapp.svg

whatsapp.svg

405 ms

mail.svg

mail.svg

409 ms

map.svg

map.svg

556 ms

banner-shap-2.png

banner-shap-2.png

751 ms

hs1.png

hs1.png

4051 ms

bg-light2.png

bg-light2.png

1843 ms

startup.svg

startup.svg

617 ms

team.svg

team.svg

748 ms

computers.svg

computers.svg

836 ms

deal.svg

deal.svg

953 ms

s9.jpg

s9.jpg

1147 ms

s10.jpg

s10.jpg

1841 ms

s7.jpg

s7.jpg

1842 ms

s5.jpg

s5.jpg

1845 ms

s6.jpg

s6.jpg

1844 ms

s8.jpg

s8.jpg

1848 ms

dot-shape.png

dot-shape.png

1903 ms

gw1.png

gw1.png

1846 ms

gw2.png

gw2.png

1846 ms

gw3.png

gw3.png

1848 ms

gw4.png

gw4.png

1884 ms

gc1.png

gc1.png

1896 ms

gc2.png

gc2.png

1945 ms

gc3.png

gc3.png

1930 ms

client-2.png

client-2.png

2097 ms

client-3.png

client-3.png

2107 ms

client-4.png

client-4.png

2093 ms

client-5.png

client-5.png

2125 ms

client-6.png

client-6.png

2163 ms

client-9.png

client-9.png

2284 ms

client-7.png

client-7.png

2151 ms

client-10.png

client-10.png

2154 ms

font

font

181 ms

font

font

182 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

97 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

2220 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

2346 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

2389 ms

client-11.png

client-11.png

2123 ms

client-8.png

client-8.png

2079 ms

client-12.png

client-12.png

2186 ms

client-13.png

client-13.png

2129 ms

client-14.png

client-14.png

2080 ms

client-15.png

client-15.png

2206 ms

gov1.png

gov1.png

2127 ms

gov2.png

gov2.png

2015 ms

cor1.png

cor1.png

1837 ms

cor2.png

cor2.png

1169 ms

cor4.png

cor4.png

1328 ms

cor5.png

cor5.png

1335 ms

wy1.png

wy1.png

1356 ms

cor8.png

cor8.png

1339 ms

biem1.png

biem1.png

1355 ms

cor11.png

cor11.png

1534 ms

cor12.png

cor12.png

1544 ms

ind1.png

ind1.png

1539 ms

i2.png

i2.png

1588 ms

r1.png

r1.png

1513 ms

r2.png

r2.png

2134 ms

al1.png

al1.png

1677 ms

al2.png

al2.png

1682 ms

h1.png

h1.png

1675 ms

h5.png

h5.png

1582 ms

worker.svg

worker.svg

1676 ms

about-company.jpg

about-company.jpg

1738 ms

house.svg

house.svg

1714 ms

video-tutorials.svg

video-tutorials.svg

1739 ms

healthcare.svg

healthcare.svg

1679 ms

travel-case.svg

travel-case.svg

1722 ms

money-growth.svg

money-growth.svg

1757 ms

taxi.svg

taxi.svg

1597 ms

smartphone.svg

smartphone.svg

1626 ms

event.svg

event.svg

1601 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1872 ms

user1.jpg

user1.jpg

1521 ms

user2.jpg

user2.jpg

1512 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1938 ms

user3.jpg

user3.jpg

1518 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

1879 ms

user4.jpg

user4.jpg

1512 ms

user5.jpg

user5.jpg

1529 ms

user6.jpg

user6.jpg

1567 ms

gp1.png

gp1.png

1887 ms

gp2.png

gp2.png

1556 ms

gp4.png

gp4.png

1574 ms

en-img.png

en-img.png

1626 ms

fa-solid-900.svg

fa-solid-900.svg

926 ms

fa-regular-400.svg

fa-regular-400.svg

1080 ms

fa-brands-400.svg

fa-brands-400.svg

664 ms

fallback

fallback

87 ms

fallback

fallback

33 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

4 ms

css

css

18 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

3 ms

font

font

6 ms

Accessibility Review

webmaker.in accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webmaker.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webmaker.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmaker.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmaker.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmaker.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Maker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: