Tools & Wizards About Us
webmarker.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

webmarker.net

Webmarker.net - Webverzeichnis / online Webkatalog ohne Backlinkpflicht.

Page Load Speed

751 ms in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

411 ms

Page Rendered

198 ms

webmarker.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webmarker.net homepage info - get ready to check Webmarker best content right away, or after learning these important things about webmarker.net

PR Webverzeichnis mit PageRank Vererbung beinhaltet Links zu deutschsprachigen Webseiten aus verschiedenen Themenbereichen. Der Webkatalog wird redaktionell geprüft und ist für die großen Suchmasch...

Visit webmarker.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmarker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 609 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmarker.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmarker.net

142 ms

www.webmarker.net

106 ms

style.css

50 ms

wm1logo.gif

98 ms

arr.gif

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webmarker.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (142 ms) belongs to the original domain Webmarker.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

38.5 kB

After Optimization

20.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webmarker.net main page is 38.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 19.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 51 B

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmarker images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmarker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmarker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmarker.net

webmarker.net

142 ms

www.webmarker.net

www.webmarker.net

106 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

wm1logo.gif

wm1logo.gif

98 ms

arr.gif

arr.gif

98 ms

icreise.gif

icreise.gif

98 ms

icherz.gif

icherz.gif

99 ms

icauto.gif

icauto.gif

98 ms

icmusik.gif

icmusik.gif

98 ms

icsport.gif

icsport.gif

98 ms

icfoto.gif

icfoto.gif

108 ms

automarker_automobilhersteller_300.jpg

automarker_automobilhersteller_300.jpg

108 ms

pinguin.gif

pinguin.gif

136 ms

Accessibility Review

webmarker.net accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

webmarker.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

webmarker.net SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmarker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is German. Our system also found out that Webmarker.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmarker.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmarker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: