Tools & Wizards About Us
webmission.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

webmission.in

Web Design & Development Company in Rajpura Punjab

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

463 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

543 ms

webmission.in screenshot

About Website

Visit webmission.in now to see the best up-to-date Web Mission content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmission.in

To build and grow your business over the internet, you ought to seek services from professionals.

Visit webmission.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmission.in page load time and found that the first response time was 463 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmission.in performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmission.in

463 ms

www.webmission.in

949 ms

style.css

236 ms

js

57 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

471 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Webmission.in, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmission.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

964.9 kB

After Optimization

906.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webmission.in main page is 964.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 725.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 45.6 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 725.5 kB
  • After minification 711.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Mission images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 291 B

  • Original 113.7 kB
  • After minification 113.7 kB
  • After compression 113.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB
  • After compression 74.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmission.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (67%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Mission. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmission.in

webmission.in

463 ms

www.webmission.in

www.webmission.in

949 ms

style.css

style.css

236 ms

js

js

57 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

471 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

681 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

684 ms

equal-height.min.js

equal-height.min.js

687 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

686 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

698 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

702 ms

modernizr.custom.13711.js

modernizr.custom.13711.js

909 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

920 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

917 ms

progress-bar.min.js

progress-bar.min.js

916 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

934 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

934 ms

count-to.js

count-to.js

1135 ms

YTPlayer.min.js

YTPlayer.min.js

1148 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

1147 ms

bootsnav.js

bootsnav.js

1149 ms

main.js

main.js

1166 ms

css2

css2

30 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

936 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1131 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

1144 ms

flaticon-set.css

flaticon-set.css

1145 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1144 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

1170 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

1166 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1361 ms

bootsnav.css

bootsnav.css

1374 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1377 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

306 ms

2.png

2.png

1187 ms

3.webp

3.webp

304 ms

1.png

1.png

739 ms

a1.webp

a1.webp

521 ms

a2.webp

a2.webp

454 ms

3.png

3.png

540 ms

happy.webp

happy.webp

539 ms

1.svg

1.svg

681 ms

need-help.webp

need-help.webp

974 ms

map.svg

map.svg

769 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

859 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

768 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

131 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

162 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

172 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

193 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

192 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

193 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

834 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

865 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

994 ms

19.png

19.png

930 ms

Accessibility Review

webmission.in accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webmission.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webmission.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmission.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmission.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmission.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Mission. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: