Tools & Wizards About Us
webmonkeystudio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

webmonkeystudio.com

Web Design Kent, Web Monkey Studio Based In Canterbury

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

459 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

webmonkeystudio.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Monkey Studio content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmonkeystudio.com

With a wealth of experience in web design, graphic design & branding, we can provide the right solution for your website. Get in touch to find out more.

Visit webmonkeystudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmonkeystudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 459 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmonkeystudio.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value17,460 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmonkeystudio.com

459 ms

webmonkeystudio.com

762 ms

gtm.js

63 ms

analytics.js

52 ms

208cb004-e946-4464-8e95-f8765a4d50b8.js

414 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Webmonkeystudio.com, 19% (14 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmonkeystudio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 331.5 kB (34%)

Content Size

973.7 kB

After Optimization

642.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webmonkeystudio.com main page is 973.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 519.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 50.0 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 519.3 kB
  • After minification 519.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Monkey Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 135.7 kB

  • Original 228.4 kB
  • After minification 221.9 kB
  • After compression 92.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 153.1 kB

  • Original 175.9 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmonkeystudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (52%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Monkey Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webmonkeystudio.com

webmonkeystudio.com

459 ms

webmonkeystudio.com

webmonkeystudio.com

762 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

63 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

208cb004-e946-4464-8e95-f8765a4d50b8.js

208cb004-e946-4464-8e95-f8765a4d50b8.js

414 ms

avatar-manager.min.css

avatar-manager.min.css

202 ms

styles.css

styles.css

201 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

202 ms

bootstrap.minify.css

bootstrap.minify.css

477 ms

animate.css

animate.css

568 ms

style.css

style.css

680 ms

outdatedBrowser.min.css

outdatedBrowser.min.css

388 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

802 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

473 ms

avatar-manager.min.js

avatar-manager.min.js

557 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

910 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

735 ms

loadr.min.js

loadr.min.js

832 ms

outdatedBrowser.min.js

outdatedBrowser.min.js

832 ms

collect

collect

2 ms

oav5idi.js

oav5idi.js

92 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

107 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

883 ms

main.js

main.js

881 ms

jquery.sonar.min.js

jquery.sonar.min.js

881 ms

lazy-load.js

lazy-load.js

882 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

882 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

880 ms

icon

icon

35 ms

pattern-10.png

pattern-10.png

444 ms

paint.png

paint.png

775 ms

logoico.png

logoico.png

315 ms

homepage.jpg

homepage.jpg

658 ms

noise.png

noise.png

414 ms

wmslogo.svg

wmslogo.svg

314 ms

spritesheet-vert.png

spritesheet-vert.png

774 ms

canterbury-1.jpg

canterbury-1.jpg

817 ms

marketing-1.jpg

marketing-1.jpg

978 ms

paul-new-1.jpg

paul-new-1.jpg

862 ms

axel.jpg

axel.jpg

1020 ms

thom.jpg

thom.jpg

1097 ms

6994129115_d04360629b_b-1-1.jpg

6994129115_d04360629b_b-1-1.jpg

1357 ms

marie-claude.jpg

marie-claude.jpg

1362 ms

charlotte.jpg

charlotte.jpg

1205 ms

andy.jpg

andy.jpg

1412 ms

mark-lean-2.png

mark-lean-2.png

1878 ms

marklanedesigns-lighthigh-res.png

marklanedesigns-lighthigh-res.png

1617 ms

brabourneproject-1.jpg

brabourneproject-1.jpg

1729 ms

brabournelogo.png

brabournelogo.png

1616 ms

brushstrokes-projectcover-1.jpg

brushstrokes-projectcover-1.jpg

1794 ms

brushstrokes-logo.png

brushstrokes-logo.png

1759 ms

2fcrYFNaTjcS6g4U3t-Y5StnKWgpfO2iSkLzTz-AABg.ttf

2fcrYFNaTjcS6g4U3t-Y5StnKWgpfO2iSkLzTz-AABg.ttf

233 ms

loader.js

loader.js

220 ms

d

d

114 ms

d

d

215 ms

d

d

216 ms

d

d

216 ms

d

d

215 ms

d

d

216 ms

d

d

209 ms

d

d

207 ms

d

d

238 ms

d

d

238 ms

d

d

251 ms

d

d

251 ms

d

d

250 ms

impl-1_28.js

impl-1_28.js

21 ms

wcm

wcm

139 ms

wcm

wcm

138 ms

p.gif

p.gif

129 ms

wcm

wcm

32 ms

wcm

wcm

60 ms

Accessibility Review

webmonkeystudio.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webmonkeystudio.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

webmonkeystudio.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmonkeystudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmonkeystudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webmonkeystudio.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Monkey Studio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: