Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

webopixel.net

webOpixel

Page Load Speed

763 ms in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

342 ms

Page Rendered

92 ms

webopixel.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing WebOpixel content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webopixel.net

このブログは管理人が日々のWeb制作(主にWordpress、jQuery)で気づいたことなどをひたすらメモる、私的メモブログのようなものです。

Visit webopixel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Webopixel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 434 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webopixel.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,910 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webopixel.net

329 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webopixel.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (329 ms) belongs to the original domain Webopixel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 296 B (36%)

Content Size

831 B

After Optimization

535 B

In fact, the total size of Webopixel.net main page is 831 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 831 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 296 B

  • Original 831 B
  • After minification 821 B
  • After compression 535 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 296 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

webopixel.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webopixel.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

webopixel.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webopixel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webopixel.net main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WebOpixel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: