Tools & Wizards About Us
weboptions.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

weboptions.net

** Web Options LLC, Specializing in Web Application development. **

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

326 ms

weboptions.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Options content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about weboptions.net

Web Options LLC, Specializing in Web Application development, Joomla, SharePoint, ASP.Net, and CMS PHP

Visit weboptions.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Weboptions.net page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weboptions.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.489

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weboptions.net

15 ms

322 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

42 ms

k2.css

58 ms

content.css

113 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Weboptions.net, 86% (63 requests) were made to Weboptionsllc.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (474 ms) relates to the external source Weboptionsllc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Weboptions.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 258 B

  • Original 577 B
  • After minification 554 B
  • After compression 319 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 258 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 102.8 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Options images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 204.3 kB
  • After minification 203.7 kB
  • After compression 190.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 44.1 kB
  • After compression 37.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Weboptions.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (44%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Options. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

weboptions.net

weboptions.net

15 ms

322 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

42 ms

k2.css

k2.css

58 ms

content.css

content.css

113 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

214 ms

default.css

default.css

162 ms

template.css

template.css

159 ms

touch.gallery.css

touch.gallery.css

161 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

161 ms

camera.css

camera.css

168 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

219 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

268 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

225 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

221 ms

k2.frontend.js

k2.frontend.js

228 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

281 ms

core.js

core.js

280 ms

caption.js

caption.js

280 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

391 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

292 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

323 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

323 ms

touch.gallery.js

touch.gallery.js

329 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

329 ms

camera.js

camera.js

342 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

379 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

378 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

383 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.js

jquery.hoverIntent.js

384 ms

js

js

73 ms

js

js

127 ms

8340610.js

8340610.js

43 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

28 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

49 ms

texture.jpg

texture.jpg

104 ms

header_tail.jpg

header_tail.jpg

103 ms

3wplogo.png

3wplogo.png

102 ms

search_tail.png

search_tail.png

62 ms

search_button.png

search_button.png

60 ms

main_bg.jpg

main_bg.jpg

309 ms

drupal-728x90.gif

drupal-728x90.gif

100 ms

content_tail_2.jpg

content_tail_2.jpg

78 ms

newslide-1.png

newslide-1.png

116 ms

Office365SharePoint.png

Office365SharePoint.png

117 ms

smmoblie.png

smmoblie.png

105 ms

mainbottom_bg.jpg

mainbottom_bg.jpg

106 ms

title_bg.png

title_bg.png

120 ms

title_after.png

title_after.png

159 ms

sm_abndealslogo.png

sm_abndealslogo.png

159 ms

1MichelleLucas.jpg

1MichelleLucas.jpg

168 ms

airporttaxi_rp2.jpg

airporttaxi_rp2.jpg

169 ms

1SmogTech1.jpg

1SmogTech1.jpg

173 ms

Tecnadyne130.jpg

Tecnadyne130.jpg

262 ms

SESCo130.jpg

SESCo130.jpg

212 ms

Summa130.jpg

Summa130.jpg

224 ms

AngelPrint130.jpg

AngelPrint130.jpg

222 ms

1PW_Ministries.jpg

1PW_Ministries.jpg

228 ms

footer_texture.gif

footer_texture.gif

266 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

330 ms

tube.png

tube.png

278 ms

feed.png

feed.png

283 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

316 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

318 ms

up-arrow.png

up-arrow.png

330 ms

benchnine-regular-webfont.woff

benchnine-regular-webfont.woff

469 ms

benchnine-light-webfont.woff

benchnine-light-webfont.woff

359 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

317 ms

slide-2.png

slide-2.png

474 ms

benchnine-bold-webfont.woff

benchnine-bold-webfont.woff

325 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

collect

collect

3 ms

slide-3.png

slide-3.png

158 ms

Accessibility Review

weboptions.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

weboptions.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

weboptions.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weboptions.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Weboptions.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

weboptions.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Options. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: