Tools & Wizards About Us
webpipl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

webpipl.com

AI and NLP enabled Recruitment Software | WebPipl

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

391 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

545 ms

webpipl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Pipl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webpipl.com

Revolutionize your recruitment process with WebPipl's AI recruitment software. Streamline your hiring, accelerate time-to-fill, and improve the quality of your talent pool with our powerful NLP a...

Visit webpipl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webpipl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 391 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webpipl.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webpipl.com

391 ms

blog.webpipl.com

1225 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

192 ms

style.min.css

383 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

567 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Webpipl.com, 55% (38 requests) were made to Blog.webpipl.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Blog.webpipl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.8 kB (19%)

Content Size

392.4 kB

After Optimization

318.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webpipl.com main page is 392.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 155.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 22.4 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Pipl needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 702 B

  • Original 155.9 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 155.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 142.8 kB
  • After minification 142.8 kB
  • After compression 132.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpipl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (84%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Pipl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webpipl.com

webpipl.com

391 ms

blog.webpipl.com

blog.webpipl.com

1225 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

192 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

383 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

567 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

568 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

570 ms

ie.css

ie.css

768 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

571 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

774 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

753 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

946 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

760 ms

css2

css2

49 ms

aos.css

aos.css

760 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1134 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

969 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

974 ms

glightbox.min.css

glightbox.min.css

976 ms

remixicon.css

remixicon.css

977 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

1141 ms

style.css

style.css

1143 ms

jquery-3.2.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.slim.min.js

34 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

52 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

51 ms

purecounter_vanilla.js

purecounter_vanilla.js

1141 ms

aos.js

aos.js

1277 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

1278 ms

glightbox.min.js

glightbox.min.js

1328 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1332 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1523 ms

validate.js

validate.js

1367 ms

main.js

main.js

1366 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1371 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1511 ms

index.js

index.js

1512 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

1548 ms

e-202423.js

e-202423.js

34 ms

logo-blue.png

logo-blue.png

859 ms

logo-vodafone.png

logo-vodafone.png

791 ms

logo.png

logo.png

588 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

790 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

803 ms

logo-4.png

logo-4.png

804 ms

logo-5.png

logo-5.png

803 ms

logo-6.png

logo-6.png

805 ms

icon-iverified.png

icon-iverified.png

977 ms

icon-talent-assessment.png

icon-talent-assessment.png

979 ms

icon-myAts.png

icon-myAts.png

1006 ms

icon-iskills.png

icon-iskills.png

1006 ms

service_icon2.png

service_icon2.png

1007 ms

service_icon3.png

service_icon3.png

1008 ms

service_icon4.png

service_icon4.png

1171 ms

service_icon1.png

service_icon1.png

1172 ms

teja.jpg

teja.jpg

1204 ms

pooja.jpg

pooja.jpg

1205 ms

naveen.jpg

naveen.jpg

1207 ms

simran.jpg

simran.jpg

1208 ms

gautam.jpg

gautam.jpg

1364 ms

roshini.jpg

roshini.jpg

1365 ms

down_arrow_icon.png

down_arrow_icon.png

378 ms

working-with-online-platforms.jpg

working-with-online-platforms.jpg

1176 ms

img-vision.png

img-vision.png

1177 ms

font

font

23 ms

font

font

42 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

978 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

1356 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

191 ms

print.css

print.css

191 ms

Accessibility Review

webpipl.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

webpipl.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webpipl.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpipl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webpipl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webpipl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Pipl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: