7.2 sec in total
1.3 sec
5.7 sec
241 ms
Welcome to webpop.ru homepage info - get ready to check Webpop best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about webpop.ru
Проектирование сайтов и интерфейсов, создание графического дизайна в Москве, векторный дизайн, решения для сайтов, портфолио дизайнера
Visit webpop.ruWe analyzed Webpop.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
webpop.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value28.3 s
0/100
25%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
1290 ms
30 ms
39 ms
493 ms
361 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Webpop.ru, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Webpop.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 795.1 kB (15%)
5.2 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Webpop.ru main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 775.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 775.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webpop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
37
37
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webpop. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
webpop.ru
1290 ms
css
30 ms
css2
39 ms
autoptimize_52529d2aa091f05be6e8c4980a2f633c.js
493 ms
logosite1_1.png
361 ms
frame-8-1.jpg
720 ms
scene-scaled3.jpg
603 ms
mobile_iphon_guash2.jpg
840 ms
n2.jpg
601 ms
promo133.jpg
837 ms
ssss1.gif
970 ms
pre2.gif
1082 ms
glav_2.jpg
842 ms
01-1.jpg
959 ms
sex_01-1.jpg
1076 ms
index_site3.jpg
960 ms
bac3.jpg
1441 ms
123.jpg
1317 ms
swx.jpg
1082 ms
sex666.jpg
1209 ms
2-1-1-e1567166051738.jpg
1315 ms
sex777.jpg
1240 ms
girl23_2-e1567166657550.jpg
1238 ms
girl1-e1567166772693.jpg
1568 ms
disk4.jpg
1364 ms
3qBK__xVkVQ.jpg
1361 ms
sex_plastikus_ipad_scene_4.jpg
1438 ms
886350_949205751799998_1381952455417442706_o-e1567166526399.jpg
1437 ms
vector_art1.jpg
1604 ms
wedding5-c91fd71d92.jpg
1483 ms
montecarlo2-1-4b43713ce7.jpg
1560 ms
disk3.jpg
1560 ms
bac4.jpg
2157 ms
alibi-744x1024.jpg
1604 ms
hgg213.jpg
1680 ms
disk6.jpg
1682 ms
2016_konty6-e1567165607456.jpg
2046 ms
disk5.jpg
1724 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
19 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
33 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
53 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
51 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
51 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
46 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1686 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1457 ms
fa-light-300.woff
1314 ms
webpop.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webpop.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webpop.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpop.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webpop.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webpop.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webpop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: