20.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
16.4 sec
2.6 sec
Welcome to webpop.ru homepage info - get ready to check Webpop best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about webpop.ru
Проектирование сайтов и интерфейсов, создание графического дизайна в Москве, векторный дизайн, решения для сайтов, портфолио дизайнера
Visit webpop.ruWe analyzed Webpop.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 19 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
webpop.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value34.9 s
0/100
25%
Value27.6 s
0/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.1 s
0/100
10%
1600 ms
350 ms
258 ms
286 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Webpop.ru, 5% (5 requests) were made to Openstat.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8 sec) belongs to the original domain Webpop.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (12%)
10.3 MB
9.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Webpop.ru main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 429.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webpop images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 297.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 297.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 409.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpop.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 409.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (48%)
92
48
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webpop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webpop.ru
1600 ms
connect
350 ms
style-hand.css
258 ms
wizScribe.css
286 ms
css
34 ms
animate.css
299 ms
common.css
288 ms
editor_form.css
294 ms
formcraft.css
286 ms
font-awesome.css
77 ms
font-awesome-corp.css
386 ms
font-awesome-ext.css
436 ms
font-awesome-social.css
433 ms
front.css
433 ms
font-awesome.min.css
36 ms
video.js
438 ms
jquery.js
570 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
515 ms
viewportchecker.js
593 ms
edsanimate.js
564 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
593 ms
general.js
592 ms
sdk.js
651 ms
commenting.js
705 ms
sharing.js
730 ms
widgetkit-bfb772a4.css
728 ms
widgetkit-976c3aa8.js
737 ms
theme-3829b49c.css
868 ms
theme-e9314fe0.js
786 ms
script.js
722 ms
stickThis.js
762 ms
pozvonim.v13.js
2464 ms
sdk.js
24 ms
278 ms
lightbox.js
240 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
247 ms
spotlight.js
244 ms
css
27 ms
parallax_bg.jpg
2355 ms
parallax_layer1.png
3140 ms
parallax_layer2.png
1979 ms
logo668.png
1923 ms
navbar_border.png
1876 ms
border_dashed_light_vertical.png
1876 ms
logosite11.png
1918 ms
a1-c23cc7e4dc.jpg
1976 ms
nav.png
1922 ms
block_divider_light.png
1971 ms
panel_box_border.png
1971 ms
ico1.jpg
1971 ms
ico2.jpg
1972 ms
ico3.jpg
1973 ms
article_date_bg.svg
1972 ms
article_date_texture.png
1975 ms
rxoe4.png
5778 ms
femi3-637x1024.png
5117 ms
most-beautiful-web-design-websites-2.jpg
1976 ms
3de255-770x1024.jpg
3275 ms
vector.jpg
3276 ms
tian1.png
4467 ms
5555-1024x1024.png
5373 ms
art-bg_678.jpg
4473 ms
334-7857b66e1d.png
4143 ms
907218005.jpg
5342 ms
bussi1.png
5248 ms
grunge_bg_light.png
4645 ms
grunge_bg.png
4775 ms
9.jpg
4907 ms
block_divider_dark.png
5039 ms
vk.jpg
5182 ms
fb.jpg
5243 ms
twitter.jpg
5260 ms
rss.jpg
5307 ms
DBCt-NXN57MTAFjitYxdrNbQxvdFQproHqwx84HIuqM.ttf
1801 ms
teke1.jpg
5327 ms
watch.js
1 ms
hit
1845 ms
cnt.js
1843 ms
xd_arbiter.php
666 ms
xd_arbiter.php
825 ms
slideshow.js
3575 ms
close.png
3628 ms
hit
1275 ms
blank.gif
3625 ms
webpop.ru.js
549 ms
cnt
129 ms
f.gif
127 ms
pixel
22 ms
pixel
19 ms
collect
172 ms
a2-51a2a115a8.jpg
288 ms
a3-c0d96e1dfa.jpg
132 ms
webpop909-5e595a2f73.jpg
414 ms
335-9cca9edfed.png
8043 ms
336-68ef6a0a7a.jpg
938 ms
171 ms
font-awesome.css
134 ms
css
129 ms
cnt
257 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTfOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
7 ms
webpop.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webpop.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webpop.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpop.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webpop.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webpop.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webpop. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: