Tools & Wizards About Us
webportal.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

webportal.cc

后台管理平台

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

webportal.cc screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webportal content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webportal.cc

后台管理平台

Visit webportal.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Webportal.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webportal.cc performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webportal.cc

1956 ms

www.webportal.cc

2390 ms

sys.min.css

839 ms

jquery-core.min.js

1133 ms

jquery-ui-core.min.js

1417 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Webportal.cc, 88% (14 requests) were made to Ps.faisys.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Webportal.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.2 kB (46%)

Content Size

330.3 kB

After Optimization

177.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Webportal.cc main page is 330.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 121.5 kB
  • After minification 110.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webportal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 136.3 kB

  • Original 200.6 kB
  • After minification 200.6 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webportal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

webportal.cc

webportal.cc

1956 ms

www.webportal.cc

www.webportal.cc

2390 ms

sys.min.css

sys.min.css

839 ms

jquery-core.min.js

jquery-core.min.js

1133 ms

jquery-ui-core.min.js

jquery-ui-core.min.js

1417 ms

fai.min.js

fai.min.js

1155 ms

RManagebg.png

RManagebg.png

301 ms

Managebg.png

Managebg.png

1550 ms

fank.png

fank.png

306 ms

LoginBox.png

LoginBox.png

665 ms

login_middle.png

login_middle.png

630 ms

qiye_inpt.png

qiye_inpt.png

635 ms

yg_input.png

yg_input.png

646 ms

mima_input.png

mima_input.png

645 ms

login_button.png

login_button.png

932 ms

LoginBox_shadow.png

LoginBox_shadow.png

1251 ms

Accessibility Review

webportal.cc accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webportal.cc best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

webportal.cc SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webportal.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webportal.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webportal.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webportal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: