3.8 sec in total
240 ms
3 sec
592 ms
Click here to check amazing Webpublication content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webpublication.com
Wepublication digital publishing solution helps designers effortlessly create interactive digital publications, like magazines, brochures, reports, catalogues, and more.
Visit webpublication.comWe analyzed Webpublication.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
webpublication.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value2,260 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
240 ms
270 ms
423 ms
67 ms
519 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webpublication.com, 79% (70 requests) were made to Webpublication.co.uk and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 117.9 kB (11%)
1.0 MB
925.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Webpublication.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 650.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webpublication images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpublication.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (62%)
76
29
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webpublication. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
webpublication.com
240 ms
webpublication.co.uk
270 ms
webpublication.co.uk
423 ms
gtm.js
67 ms
autoptimize_802425bc2df09c1b65197db088964b24.css
519 ms
dashicons.min.css
51 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
38 ms
front.min.js
38 ms
main-min.js
44 ms
underscore.min.js
76 ms
backbone.min.js
57 ms
front-end-deps.js
55 ms
front-end.js
54 ms
jquery.tap.js
56 ms
owl.carousel.js
74 ms
owl.hash.js
73 ms
owl.navigation.js
73 ms
owl.autoplay.js
92 ms
owl.autoheight.js
94 ms
owl.animate.js
94 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
93 ms
script.js
94 ms
tracking.js
95 ms
slick.min.js
96 ms
simpleLightbox.min.js
97 ms
lazysizes.min.js
92 ms
aos.js
92 ms
aos-init.js
133 ms
4561285.js
88 ms
video.min.js
139 ms
es-widget-page.js
100 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
100 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
99 ms
frontend.min.js
162 ms
core.min.js
131 ms
pum-site-scripts-1.js
130 ms
custom.js
162 ms
analytics.js
66 ms
conversion_async.js
85 ms
collect
17 ms
724 ms
collect
36 ms
ga-audiences
36 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
177 ms
icn-menu-has-children.svg
97 ms
icn-mobile-menu-has-children.svg
92 ms
icn-catalogue.svg
94 ms
icn-magazine.svg
100 ms
icn-press.svg
95 ms
icn-report.svg
97 ms
icn-presentation.svg
102 ms
icn-wp.svg
104 ms
icn-indesign.svg
102 ms
icn-pdf.svg
106 ms
icn-uprez.svg
108 ms
icn-academy-intro.svg
469 ms
icn-academy-tutorial.svg
471 ms
icn-academy-animation.svg
116 ms
icn-academy-templates.svg
110 ms
icn-academy-examples.svg
107 ms
icn-academy-help.svg
110 ms
icn-release-notes.svg
111 ms
icn-faq.svg
113 ms
projets-images@2x-min.jpg
118 ms
icn_es_go.svg
115 ms
icn_linkedin.svg
119 ms
icn_youtube.svg
117 ms
GT-Walsheim-Regular.woff
111 ms
GT-Walsheim-Light.woff
114 ms
GT-Walsheim-Bold.woff
112 ms
GT-Walsheim-Black.woff
112 ms
POPPINS-REGULAR.woff
345 ms
POPPINS-MEDIUM.woff
345 ms
webfont.js
336 ms
iconset_phone.svg
44 ms
4561285.js
292 ms
4561285.js
292 ms
36 ms
css
218 ms
box-agence@2x-min.png
617 ms
box-wp-en@3x-min.png
674 ms
box-uprez@2x-min.png
633 ms
quote_left.svg
360 ms
ga6Iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFcWbQ.ttf
18 ms
ga6Law1J5X9T9RW6j9bNdOwzfReedA.ttf
56 ms
ga6Kaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFImajC-.ttf
109 ms
ga6Vaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIu0RWuc-VJ.ttf
110 ms
shim.latest.js
14 ms
webpublication.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webpublication.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webpublication.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpublication.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webpublication.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webpublication.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webpublication. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: