Tools & Wizards About Us
webrtc.center screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

webrtc.center

Page of webRTC center to WebRTC Audio and our Webphone free calling

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

899 ms

webrtc.center screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing WebRTC content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webrtc.center

Webcall WebRTC-based. For the communication of tomorrow, today. Connect to the world from anywhere, anytime to any device. All you need is web browser to calls to you. Unlimited Free calls with one cl...

Visit webrtc.center

Key Findings

We analyzed Webrtc.center page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webrtc.center performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

webrtc.center

346 ms

bootstrap.min.css

146 ms

css

85 ms

prettyPhoto.css

116 ms

settings.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Webrtc.center, 10% (8 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) relates to the external source Webcallglobal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 722.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

720.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webrtc.center main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 586.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 103.5 kB

  • Original 586.2 kB
  • After minification 482.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WebRTC needs image optimization as it can save up to 103.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 367.0 kB

  • Original 550.2 kB
  • After minification 488.4 kB
  • After compression 183.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 232.0 kB

  • Original 279.0 kB
  • After minification 238.6 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webrtc.center needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (49%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WebRTC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webrtc.center

webrtc.center

346 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

146 ms

css

css

85 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

116 ms

settings.css

settings.css

118 ms

style.css

style.css

84 ms

custom-icons.css

custom-icons.css

105 ms

custom-icons-ie7.css

custom-icons-ie7.css

170 ms

test-font.css

test-font.css

120 ms

test-font-ie7

test-font-ie7

170 ms

layout.css

layout.css

240 ms

blue.css

blue.css

210 ms

modernizr-2.6.1.min.js

modernizr-2.6.1.min.js

204 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

728 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

188 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

705 ms

bootstrap-carousel.js

bootstrap-carousel.js

705 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

707 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

706 ms

jquery.tweet.js

jquery.tweet.js

708 ms

jquery.hoverdir.js

jquery.hoverdir.js

707 ms

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

708 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

708 ms

custom.js

custom.js

724 ms

js.js

js.js

903 ms

1.js

1.js

89 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

457 ms

main-logo.png

main-logo.png

448 ms

login-icon.png

login-icon.png

415 ms

signup-icon.png

signup-icon.png

439 ms

bg-blue.jpg

bg-blue.jpg

439 ms

thumb.png

thumb.png

438 ms

ohmy1.png

ohmy1.png

572 ms

screen1.png

screen1.png

587 ms

screen2.png

screen2.png

583 ms

screen3.png

screen3.png

585 ms

ohmy2.png

ohmy2.png

586 ms

n-logo.png

n-logo.png

584 ms

question-mark.png

question-mark.png

594 ms

manager.png

manager.png

754 ms

signup.png

signup.png

731 ms

hosts.png

hosts.png

747 ms

carebox.png

carebox.png

731 ms

motion.png

motion.png

752 ms

lotushouse.png

lotushouse.png

751 ms

changes.png

changes.png

756 ms

tprint.png

tprint.png

754 ms

mediaart.png

mediaart.png

755 ms

bg-footer.png

bg-footer.png

756 ms

webrtc-logo-ftr.png

webrtc-logo-ftr.png

756 ms

rss.png

rss.png

757 ms

fb.png

fb.png

762 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

378 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

384 ms

blog.png

blog.png

507 ms

divco960.jpg

divco960.jpg

523 ms

cse.js

cse.js

132 ms

embed

embed

479 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

185 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

234 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

236 ms

test-font.woff

test-font.woff

503 ms

collect

collect

76 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

81 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

50 ms

default.css

default.css

72 ms

collect

collect

349 ms

js

js

91 ms

gen_204

gen_204

75 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

351 ms

client.json

client.json

353 ms

client.json

client.json

359 ms

timer.png

timer.png

307 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

331 ms

ajax

ajax

538 ms

205.svg

205.svg

359 ms

common.js

common.js

283 ms

util.js

util.js

332 ms

map.js

map.js

291 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

131 ms

onion.js

onion.js

111 ms

search_impl.js

search_impl.js

110 ms

SEO Factors

webrtc.center SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webrtc.center can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webrtc.center main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webrtc.center

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WebRTC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: