991 ms in total
110 ms
701 ms
180 ms
Visit webrtc.org now to see the best up-to-date WebRTC content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webrtc.org
An open framework for the web that enables Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities in the browser.
Visit webrtc.orgWe analyzed Webrtc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 110 ms and then it took 881 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
webrtc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
110 ms
86 ms
87 ms
102 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Webrtc.org, 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) relates to the external source S.ytimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 656.4 kB (75%)
874.6 kB
218.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Webrtc.org main page is 874.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 572.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WebRTC needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 429.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 429.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webrtc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WebRTC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webrtc.org
110 ms
css
86 ms
bootstrap.css
87 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
102 ms
webrtc.css
105 ms
jquery-1.11.1.js
146 ms
bootstrap.js
123 ms
HCE3S1E5UwY
118 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
webrtc-logo-horiz-retro-243x40.png
81 ms
webrtc-logo-vert-retro-255x305.png
80 ms
chrome-128x128.png
79 ms
firefox-128x128.png
74 ms
opera-128x128.png
74 ms
android-128x128.png
99 ms
apple-128x128.png
136 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
66 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
78 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
86 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
101 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
151 ms
collect
13 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
73 ms
www-embed-player.js
91 ms
base.js
160 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
24 ms
ad_status.js
26 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
18 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
44 ms
webrtc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
webrtc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
webrtc.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webrtc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webrtc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webrtc.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WebRTC. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: