4.8 sec in total
721 ms
3.4 sec
658 ms
Click here to check amazing Websalutem content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websalutem.com
Websalutem provides website development, optimisation. Mobile app development. SEO. API endpoint creation. Business workflow automation
Visit websalutem.comWe analyzed Websalutem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 721 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
websalutem.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.723
6/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
721 ms
186 ms
300 ms
351 ms
355 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Websalutem.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Websalutem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 270.1 kB (14%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Websalutem.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websalutem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 133.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websalutem.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (65%)
75
26
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websalutem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websalutem.com
721 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
186 ms
style.min.css
300 ms
styles.css
351 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
355 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
356 ms
font-awesome.min.css
361 ms
css
32 ms
bootstrap.css
466 ms
font-awesome.css
410 ms
flexslider.css
453 ms
owl.carousel.css
460 ms
owl.theme.css
461 ms
bootsnav.css
474 ms
animate.css
525 ms
style.css
667 ms
css
28 ms
jquery.js
681 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
570 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
573 ms
wpgmza_data.js
585 ms
font-awesome.min.css
574 ms
common.css
614 ms
remodal.css
675 ms
remodal-default-theme.css
676 ms
legacy.css
713 ms
scripts.js
718 ms
flying-pages.min.js
739 ms
api.js
49 ms
bootstrap.js
739 ms
bootsnav.js
740 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
757 ms
owl.carousel.js
837 ms
jquery.poptrox.js
836 ms
back-to-top.js
836 ms
main.js
840 ms
wp-embed.min.js
865 ms
js
83 ms
CanvasLayerOptions.js
892 ms
CanvasLayer.js
950 ms
jquery.dataTables.js
946 ms
jquery-cookie.js
834 ms
remodal.js
721 ms
spectrum.js
686 ms
text.min.js
710 ms
pako_deflate.min.js
774 ms
wp-google-maps.min.js
780 ms
wpgmaps.js
723 ms
gtm.js
89 ms
web_developing-min.jpg
1036 ms
website-optimisation-min.jpg
789 ms
mobile-app-development.jpg
923 ms
web_dev.svg
692 ms
mobile-application-development.svg
574 ms
website_optimisation_n.svg
585 ms
integration-and-automation-services.svg
677 ms
pattern_background.png
701 ms
site-loading-speed-738x423.jpg
785 ms
iot-738x423.jpg
907 ms
virtual_identity-738x423.jpg
799 ms
qbs-logo.svg
892 ms
agerona-logo.svg
868 ms
bcs-logo.svg
875 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1069 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
938 ms
blacklimousines.svg
942 ms
efn-logo.svg
926 ms
cm-logo.svg
935 ms
recaptcha__ro.js
37 ms
analytics.js
113 ms
bc-logo.svg
1009 ms
schadler-logo.svg
1008 ms
cd-top-arrow.svg
932 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
32 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
38 ms
collect
21 ms
arrow-left.png
885 ms
arrow-right.png
895 ms
js
54 ms
ajax-loader.gif
669 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
676 ms
websalutem.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
websalutem.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
websalutem.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websalutem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websalutem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websalutem.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Websalutem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: