2.3 sec in total
411 ms
1.8 sec
122 ms
Visit webscanner.se now to see the best up-to-date Web Scanner content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webscanner.se
WebScanner testar er sajt och rapporterar trasiga länkar, stavfel, brister i SEO, tillgänglighet och LIX. Beställ en gratis rapport.
Visit webscanner.seWe analyzed Webscanner.se page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
webscanner.se performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value17.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value12,900 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.3 s
1/100
10%
411 ms
319 ms
187 ms
283 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Webscanner.se, 61% (28 requests) were made to Vincera.se and 28% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (840 ms) relates to the external source Vincera.se.
Page size can be reduced by 525.2 kB (63%)
832.7 kB
307.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webscanner.se main page is 832.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 299.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Scanner needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 176.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 254.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webscanner.se needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 254.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)
31
13
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Scanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webscanner.se
411 ms
319 ms
bootstrap.min.css
187 ms
font-awesome.min.css
283 ms
style.css
284 ms
animate.min.css
279 ms
main.css
287 ms
main-responsive.css
285 ms
theme_blue.css
283 ms
flexslider.css
371 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
bootstrap.min.js
411 ms
jquery.transit.js
410 ms
twitter-bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js
410 ms
jquery.appear.js
411 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
460 ms
jquery.cookie.js
478 ms
main.js
479 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
478 ms
vincera_logo.png
492 ms
wescanner_logo_150dpi_whitebg.png
651 ms
ws_outlook_basic.png
653 ms
ws_outlook_cols.png
654 ms
ws_excel.png
840 ms
huddinge_86x86.png
559 ms
css
23 ms
css
34 ms
blurred_orange_bg.jpg
187 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
4 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
10 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
9 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
442 ms
clip-font.woff
616 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
9 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
8 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
8 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
19 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
19 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
19 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
ga.js
10 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
blank.gif
94 ms
webscanner.se accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webscanner.se best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webscanner.se SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SV
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webscanner.se can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Webscanner.se main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
webscanner.se
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Scanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: