Tools & Wizards About Us
websitedesignodessa.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

websitedesignodessa.com

Odessa | Your Web Pro LLC

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

946 ms

Page Rendered

465 ms

websitedesignodessa.com screenshot

About Website

Visit websitedesignodessa.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Sitedesign Odessa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about websitedesignodessa.com

Visit websitedesignodessa.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Websitedesignodessa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

websitedesignodessa.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,540 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.079

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

websitedesignodessa.com

75 ms

websitedesignodessa.com

46 ms

81 ms

style.min.css

26 ms

style.min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Websitedesignodessa.com, 60% (33 requests) were made to Yourwebprollc.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (367 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (65%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Websitedesignodessa.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 188.8 kB

  • Original 220.7 kB
  • After minification 217.6 kB
  • After compression 31.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 352.0 kB
  • After minification 352.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Sitedesign Odessa images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 962.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 569.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 962.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 798.1 kB

  • Original 914.5 kB
  • After minification 885.4 kB
  • After compression 116.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websitedesignodessa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 798.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (79%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Sitedesign Odessa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

websitedesignodessa.com

websitedesignodessa.com

75 ms

websitedesignodessa.com

websitedesignodessa.com

46 ms

81 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

26 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

45 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

68 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

60 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

46 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

button.css

button.css

48 ms

simpay-public.min.css

simpay-public.min.css

58 ms

simpay-public-pro.min.css

simpay-public-pro.min.css

64 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

83 ms

css

css

61 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

59 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

60 ms

popup.css

popup.css

60 ms

animate.css

animate.css

69 ms

readmore.css

readmore.css

62 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

73 ms

js

js

324 ms

js

js

367 ms

et-core-unified-11434.min.css

et-core-unified-11434.min.css

63 ms

wpo-minify-footer-7ad50e43.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-7ad50e43.min.js

68 ms

49 ms

wpo-minify-footer-c70457c4.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-c70457c4.min.js

146 ms

l.js

l.js

71 ms

wpo-minify-footer-96e60946.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-96e60946.min.js

74 ms

api.js

api.js

59 ms

wpo-minify-footer-3399161a.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-3399161a.min.js

76 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

157 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

268 ms

logo-2022-v1-5.png

logo-2022-v1-5.png

201 ms

AdobeStock_42069-scaled.jpeg

AdobeStock_42069-scaled.jpeg

202 ms

build-01.png

build-01.png

201 ms

more-02.png

more-02.png

200 ms

ywp-graphic-01.png

ywp-graphic-01.png

200 ms

get-03.png

get-03.png

200 ms

recaptcha__de.js

recaptcha__de.js

271 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

106 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

110 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

91 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

98 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG7Sy.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG7Sy.ttf

111 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG7Sy.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG7Sy.ttf

184 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN9JG7Sy.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN9JG7Sy.ttf

247 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHLSy.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHLSy.ttf

244 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHLSy.ttf

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHLSy.ttf

245 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

109 ms

client.js

client.js

50 ms

client_default.css

client_default.css

106 ms

embed

embed

354 ms

js

js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

websitedesignodessa.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

websitedesignodessa.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

websitedesignodessa.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websitedesignodessa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websitedesignodessa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

websitedesignodessa.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Sitedesign Odessa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: