4.3 sec in total
184 ms
3.2 sec
872 ms
Welcome to websitetrafficreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Website Traffic Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about websitetrafficreview.com
Buy Website Traffic Reviews and Complaints - Website Traffic Review - Best Legit Traffic Sources you MUST Try! Buy Targeted Traffic that converts - BUY solo ads
Visit websitetrafficreview.comWe analyzed Websitetrafficreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
websitetrafficreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value15.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value11.9 s
16/100
10%
184 ms
619 ms
338 ms
336 ms
436 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Websitetrafficreview.com, 45% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Websitetrafficreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 341.0 kB (16%)
2.2 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Websitetrafficreview.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 220.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Website Traffic Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websitetrafficreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (56%)
39
17
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Website Traffic Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websitetrafficreview.com
184 ms
websitetrafficreview.com
619 ms
MobileSimulatorPRO.css
338 ms
wp-customer-reviews.css
336 ms
style.css
436 ms
toolbar.css
333 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
352 ms
jquery.rating.css
265 ms
style.css
379 ms
addtoany.min.css
428 ms
jquery.min.js
557 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
380 ms
MobileSimulatorPRO.js
522 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
535 ms
addtoany.min.js
535 ms
jquery.rating.min.js
535 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
545 ms
scripts.js
704 ms
element.js
49 ms
scripts.min.js
905 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
705 ms
jquery.mobile.js
705 ms
easypiechart.js
705 ms
common.js
737 ms
complianz.min.js
794 ms
black-red.jpg
472 ms
website-traffic-review.png
471 ms
sales-no-traffic.png
472 ms
guaranteed-quality-guarantee.png
473 ms
0-wtr2.png
487 ms
trophee.png
473 ms
0-wtr-certified.png
560 ms
best-website-traffic.png
560 ms
0-wtr-certified-150x150.png
566 ms
0-wtr-not-certified-150x150.png
507 ms
1star.png
514 ms
hf.WOFF
549 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
40 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
50 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
50 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
40 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
49 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
50 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
81 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
82 ms
hf1.WOFF
554 ms
modules.woff
714 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9aXw.woff
91 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9aXw.woff
89 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9aXw.woff
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9aX8.ttf
90 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9aXw.woff
94 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9aX8.ttf
93 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8aXw.woff
94 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8aX8.ttf
93 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6aXw.woff
93 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aXw.woff
148 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6aX8.ttf
148 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6aXw.woff
145 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6aX8.ttf
149 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16aXw.woff
148 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16aX8.ttf
148 ms
pink-dark.jpg
1189 ms
flags.png
335 ms
Top-Backgrounds-043.jpg
495 ms
mkt_digital_baixa-1.jpg
940 ms
style.min.css
198 ms
websitetrafficreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
websitetrafficreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
websitetrafficreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websitetrafficreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websitetrafficreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websitetrafficreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Website Traffic Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: