2.2 sec in total
96 ms
1.6 sec
467 ms
Welcome to websort.net homepage info - get ready to check Websort best content right away, or after learning these important things about websort.net
UX Design Tools. Optimal Workshop offer a suite of tools to help design researchers and information architects improve the user experience of their products
Visit websort.netWe analyzed Websort.net page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
websort.net performance score
96 ms
201 ms
46 ms
201 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Websort.net, 79% (48 requests) were made to Optimalworkshop.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (721 ms) relates to the external source Optimalworkshop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 246.9 kB (43%)
571.7 kB
324.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Websort.net main page is 571.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 208.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websort images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 98.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.0 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websort.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 119.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (15%)
46
39
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
websort.net
96 ms
www.optimalworkshop.com
201 ms
frontend-eb822fba43741c411660e9c1b63c8330.css
46 ms
jquery_base-535438bcd2038e435522a15768711905.js
201 ms
frontend-16e4bf41214ae8ecffdc02c70ce5eb27.js
367 ms
conversion.js
349 ms
mixpanel-2.2.min.js
602 ms
j.php
491 ms
ow_logo_dark_sm-4d5988bf4710d6e904c535d394a99d8f.png
235 ms
logo_line_tj_dark-9e921b323ec68729a81d5581edfdd0e2.png
235 ms
logo_line_os_dark-7182238dff74f665037df7c0f589c097.png
233 ms
logo_line_cm_dark-a3199f9fd1d017c353413082c10b08f5.png
550 ms
logo_line_rf_dark-d625a2954836b770aa5ea709a547cf6b.png
551 ms
logo_treejack_light_lg-bc84bf9b948a15c157a77a9b958673a4.png
549 ms
logo_optimalsort_light_lg-48a814fd8fa217ab82ea1dd58b1468ba.png
550 ms
logo_chalkmark_light_lg-4f61f93202ac2e99b480a1291db860e9.png
548 ms
logo_reframer_light_lg-9642c39b53a47b8d37a31bfd33059aa8.png
540 ms
g-beta-sticker-ce0f6ca50f5a7b8982a4fec5200e403c.png
566 ms
nationalgeographic-16d7fa212d232aec9f780e505f4aef3e.png
564 ms
unicef-a9dbd83435795434cb91929b9ebd5305.png
564 ms
mit-30616c06369fd03b91b8bf0a0f993d3b.png
563 ms
vodafone-c10d3aa8be765715398931bf31fda0da.png
561 ms
deloitte-874823b6abfab873b36c5106395302c2.png
559 ms
britishairways-a825b858c5dff1e2bfcbae974e61f5c9.png
705 ms
newyorktimes-6584657d17f54eeeb07bd81a1904950d.png
705 ms
google-d85deccad7ec9f14af5dddb949500056.png
705 ms
bbc-84977fbcf9432b3daff3a35467eb57b9.png
704 ms
nasa-6cd9152e9ff03b80b5145fcffb428244.png
705 ms
netflix-fdbd16dd544ca7517d01c208c1b80637.png
701 ms
autodesk-f178b7c486bb1b200319c526adb6785a.png
715 ms
tj-treetest-d0170143e4094b1f5786b9a3d0564e3e.png
715 ms
os-cardsort-a3a6a307e3c95be17a034a7f5635d233.png
721 ms
cm-firstclick-b1ec0dd00abb6362308351f544221bd7.png
716 ms
rf-explore-13c2978087007ca7b13a64e150c1a185.png
716 ms
gtm.js
701 ms
bg_knolled_blue-bc246a22ab60ccfce2e670c0b697e4fe.png
677 ms
proxima-nova_regular-411e684de497d78f94febdab4ac61432.woff
383 ms
proxima-nova_light-c3fbbebcbe79962924e834b393da3e40.woff
381 ms
proxima-nova_semibold-eab7d456f6c0121a38f0b12d1f6a0296.woff
379 ms
proxima-nova_bold-621e318161c09a59d19c409f5e156e93.woff
383 ms
fontawesome-webfont-4136925dcbc1a7b93a3bc27d461170b8.woff
385 ms
Museo700-Regular-webfont-104a0c79337a6dd8ec0cb1e970d6cb71.woff
376 ms
Museo500-Regular-webfont-a9ff9a12a814dc8e3f97c6da5b32b56d.woff
380 ms
Museo300-Regular-webfont-1b8ee3f7bf07991bab8f02fcde217517.woff
381 ms
proxima-nova_italic-49990e441510ca12c61c2c11988ca388.woff
385 ms
proxima-nova_light_italic-a544a4eb3bd94d10e3bbb3a41c185420.woff
385 ms
proxima-nova_semibold_italic-a294acda2c525ba5f3f93fb12e9e7bbc.woff
383 ms
proxima-nova_bold_italic-44a81644548321c509887b922c4a511c.woff
380 ms
317 ms
v.gif
69 ms
va-f9423035fc9f0fdad5f7654cfb9df14b.js
47 ms
324 ms
329 ms
345 ms
291 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
logo-optimalsort-black-35fd2d97fb34613fcb8dfecbdd5c706d.png
81 ms
logo-chalkmark-black-523c7fb3074cdaecb5bd384d5a977686.png
37 ms
logo-reframer-black-22424bcbd6e3d032bf7b8da509ba3bbd.png
39 ms
g-beta-sticker-bad99f80301f7132c346026ef2deb8e0.png
51 ms
logo-treejack-black-478ff38284639cca9fc55e2ed49e0907.png
61 ms
websort.net SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websort.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Websort.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
websort.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Websort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: