9.3 sec in total
103 ms
8.3 sec
863 ms
Click here to check amazing Websoulsurfer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websoulsurfer.com
Websoulsurfer - A San Diego Padres Blog - RANDOM RAMBLINGS, HEATED DIATRIBES, AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ABOUT THE SAN DIEGO PADRES AND THE GREAT SPORT OF BASEBALL
Visit websoulsurfer.comWe analyzed Websoulsurfer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
websoulsurfer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value24.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.9 s
4/100
10%
Value3,580 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value30.3 s
0/100
10%
103 ms
8 ms
462 ms
172 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 172 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Websoulsurfer.com, 12% (20 requests) were made to S.pubmine.com and 10% (18 requests) were made to Usersync.gumgum.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) relates to the external source Image6.pubmatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 112.6 kB (46%)
242.6 kB
130.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Websoulsurfer.com main page is 242.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 142.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 479 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websoulsurfer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 344 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websoulsurfer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 119 (82%)
145
26
The browser has sent 145 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websoulsurfer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websoulsurfer.com
103 ms
websoulsurfer.wordpress.com
8 ms
websoulsurfer.wordpress.com
462 ms
webfont.js
172 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
196 ms
511 ms
style.css
539 ms
css
593 ms
222 ms
global.css
363 ms
536 ms
style.css
362 ms
gprofiles.js
526 ms
wpgroho.js
822 ms
352 ms
525 ms
562 ms
w.js
563 ms
css
561 ms
global-print.css
436 ms
conf
375 ms
ga.js
759 ms
cropped-websoulsurfer-a-san-diego-padres-blog-2560x640.png
2043 ms
326 ms
wpcom-gray-white.png
223 ms
3XFtErwl05Ad_vSCF6Fq7xX2Qtzc.ttf
801 ms
OZpbg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP_eE3vcKnd.ttf
802 ms
OZpEg_xvsDZQL_LKIF7q4jP3w2j_.ttf
800 ms
3XFzErwl05Ad_vSCF6Fq7xX2R-zb_Pw.ttf
801 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
179 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
706 ms
kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNXaxY.ttf
1165 ms
kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY5KcU.ttf
1138 ms
kmKhZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNcWx8QCQ.ttf
1321 ms
ata.js
758 ms
g.gif
1030 ms
hovercard.min.css
455 ms
services.min.css
690 ms
1085 ms
g.gif
900 ms
g.gif
916 ms
__utm.gif
188 ms
5.js
431 ms
pixel
427 ms
tag.js
621 ms
uc.html
734 ms
user_sync.html
767 ms
user_sync.html
892 ms
prbds2s
893 ms
async_usersync.html
778 ms
user_sync.html
1002 ms
usync.html
889 ms
checksync.php
2219 ms
iframe
663 ms
jslog
145 ms
setuid
940 ms
all
2074 ms
match
825 ms
30907
1282 ms
sync
303 ms
match
282 ms
PugMaster
5051 ms
match
389 ms
URnmbSKM
1459 ms
user_sync.html
541 ms
match
495 ms
usermatch
791 ms
usync.js
490 ms
pd
505 ms
match
616 ms
1552 ms
match
684 ms
match
686 ms
1601 ms
0.gif
1417 ms
match
695 ms
usersync
1334 ms
match
363 ms
match
356 ms
match
494 ms
2d58b939-7a67-ee79-c42e-29a76ad8f3c3
1088 ms
ny75r2x0
1209 ms
match
369 ms
match
814 ms
us.gif
1098 ms
us.gif
1096 ms
ZMAwryCI
1082 ms
match
700 ms
us.gif
809 ms
usersync
1020 ms
us.gif
804 ms
us.gif
968 ms
demconf.jpg
697 ms
usersync
1016 ms
info2
613 ms
usersync
1013 ms
us.gif
820 ms
us.gif
885 ms
pixel
682 ms
usersync
912 ms
usersync
911 ms
usersync.aspx
955 ms
710489.gif
1014 ms
generic
650 ms
usersync
826 ms
usersync
757 ms
pixel
562 ms
pixel
491 ms
match
387 ms
usersync
751 ms
us.gif
520 ms
pixel
425 ms
match
266 ms
usync.html
324 ms
usersync
624 ms
us.gif
391 ms
usg.gif
432 ms
pixel
406 ms
pixel
401 ms
engine
653 ms
rtset
348 ms
usersync
504 ms
cksync.php
290 ms
cksync.php
529 ms
usersync
457 ms
cksync.html
629 ms
cksync.php
536 ms
sd
257 ms
cksync
2563 ms
rum
283 ms
sd
264 ms
sync
259 ms
cksync
2735 ms
usync.html
255 ms
dcm
251 ms
usersync
391 ms
tap.php
232 ms
tap.php
361 ms
cksync.php
373 ms
match
238 ms
usermatchredir
163 ms
generic
219 ms
usync.html
245 ms
rum
229 ms
tap.php
277 ms
match
181 ms
crum
139 ms
usersync
145 ms
match
324 ms
match
324 ms
match
322 ms
rum
358 ms
140 ms
usersync
130 ms
match
246 ms
ecm3
156 ms
cksync.php
188 ms
usersync
92 ms
cksync.php
141 ms
usersync
89 ms
cksync.php
170 ms
cksync.php
164 ms
cksync.php
107 ms
ecm3
88 ms
match
31 ms
cksync.php
78 ms
cksync.php
82 ms
match
15 ms
match
12 ms
generic
9 ms
cksync.php
74 ms
usersync
4 ms
websoulsurfer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
websoulsurfer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
websoulsurfer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websoulsurfer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websoulsurfer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websoulsurfer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Websoulsurfer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: