Tools & Wizards About Us
websoulsurfer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

websoulsurfer.com

Websoulsurfer – A San Diego Padres Blog – RANDOM RAMBLINGS, HEATED DIATRIBES, AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ABOUT THE SAN DIEGO PADRES AND THE GREAT SPORT ...

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

867 ms

Page Rendered

634 ms

websoulsurfer.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Websoulsurfer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websoulsurfer.com

Websoulsurfer - A San Diego Padres Blog - RANDOM RAMBLINGS, HEATED DIATRIBES, AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ABOUT THE SAN DIEGO PADRES AND THE GREAT SPORT OF BASEBALL

Visit websoulsurfer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Websoulsurfer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

websoulsurfer.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,000 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

websoulsurfer.com

42 ms

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

5 ms

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

226 ms

webfont.js

103 ms

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Websoulsurfer.com, 23% (9 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 18% (7 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (282 ms) relates to the external source S.pubmine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.4 kB (34%)

Content Size

368.1 kB

After Optimization

242.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Websoulsurfer.com main page is 368.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 158.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 123.8 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 154.5 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 475 B

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websoulsurfer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 788 B

  • Original 155.4 kB
  • After minification 155.4 kB
  • After compression 154.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 302 B

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websoulsurfer.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websoulsurfer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

websoulsurfer.com

websoulsurfer.com

42 ms

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

5 ms

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

websoulsurfer.wordpress.com

226 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

103 ms

101 ms

style.css

style.css

134 ms

133 ms

127 ms

143 ms

style.css

style.css

138 ms

css

css

157 ms

130 ms

global.css

global.css

139 ms

139 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

140 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

140 ms

138 ms

141 ms

w.js

w.js

140 ms

css

css

60 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

2 ms

conf

conf

282 ms

ga.js

ga.js

157 ms

cropped-websoulsurfer-a-san-diego-padres-blog-2560x640.png

cropped-websoulsurfer-a-san-diego-padres-blog-2560x640.png

203 ms

125 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

113 ms

wpcom-mark.svg

wpcom-mark.svg

94 ms

g.gif

g.gif

157 ms

179 ms

g.gif

g.gif

135 ms

g.gif

g.gif

134 ms

font

font

159 ms

font

font

155 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

35 ms

font

font

219 ms

font

font

70 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

56 ms

ata.js

ata.js

44 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

44 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

43 ms

Accessibility Review

websoulsurfer.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

websoulsurfer.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

websoulsurfer.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websoulsurfer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websoulsurfer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

websoulsurfer.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Websoulsurfer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: