Tools & Wizards About Us
webstract.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

webstract.com

Webstract - Internet Marketing & Web Design in Los Angeles CA

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

950 ms

webstract.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Webstract content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webstract.com

Webstract Marketing is a web design & internet marketing agency for small to medium-sized businesses, offering web design, SEO, PPC, copywriting and more.

Visit webstract.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Webstract.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webstract.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,910 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webstract.com

168 ms

www.webstract.com

120 ms

www.webstract.com

218 ms

css

96 ms

style.min.css

396 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Webstract.com, 57% (50 requests) were made to Webstract.b-cdn.net and 17% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) relates to the external source Webstract.b-cdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 144.2 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webstract.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 616.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 114.9 kB

  • Original 140.1 kB
  • After minification 133.2 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 616.8 kB
  • After minification 609.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webstract images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 352.9 kB
  • After minification 352.7 kB
  • After compression 339.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 113.9 kB
  • After minification 113.9 kB
  • After compression 105.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webstract.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (64%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webstract. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webstract.com

webstract.com

168 ms

www.webstract.com

www.webstract.com

120 ms

www.webstract.com

www.webstract.com

218 ms

css

css

96 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

396 ms

style.css

style.css

488 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

428 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

417 ms

webfonts.css

webfonts.css

411 ms

style.css

style.css

378 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

383 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

383 ms

webstract.js

webstract.js

384 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

386 ms

handl-utm-grabber.js

handl-utm-grabber.js

388 ms

js

js

170 ms

js

js

250 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

46 ms

platform.js

platform.js

492 ms

widget.js

widget.js

398 ms

L_OX4qt3WLh75L5Oe5IGtboBjKYHWQUfkPZIvN8WCrYCcL6ZxHD6Aw9EM6LvZNNGwEKuKQ.js

L_OX4qt3WLh75L5Oe5IGtboBjKYHWQUfkPZIvN8WCrYCcL6ZxHD6Aw9EM6LvZNNGwEKuKQ.js

399 ms

swap.js

swap.js

101 ms

widget.js

widget.js

90 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

401 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

482 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

414 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

490 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

416 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

482 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

482 ms

common.js

common.js

489 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

489 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

811 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

488 ms

fsa.js

fsa.js

372 ms

bat.js

bat.js

284 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

111 ms

js

js

111 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

328 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf

329 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf

609 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf

665 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf

667 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf

667 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf

667 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

40 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

40 ms

390DFA_D_0.woff

390DFA_D_0.woff

326 ms

390DFA_10_0.woff

390DFA_10_0.woff

324 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

41 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4c.ttf

662 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4c.ttf

660 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4c.ttf

703 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4c.ttf

729 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4c.ttf

728 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4c.ttf

727 ms

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4c.ttf

iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4c.ttf

727 ms

LYjYdHv3kUk9BMV96EIswT9DIbW-MIS11zY.ttf

LYjYdHv3kUk9BMV96EIswT9DIbW-MIS11zY.ttf

727 ms

390DFA_20_0.woff

390DFA_20_0.woff

618 ms

390DFA_1C_0.woff

390DFA_1C_0.woff

436 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

collect

collect

194 ms

loader.js

loader.js

489 ms

390DFA_19_0.woff

390DFA_19_0.woff

393 ms

asset-services-image.jpg

asset-services-image.jpg

302 ms

asset-team-image.jpg

asset-team-image.jpg

303 ms

asset-bottom-cta.jpg

asset-bottom-cta.jpg

301 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

420 ms

widget_app_base_1709553975535.js

widget_app_base_1709553975535.js

254 ms

splash-image.jpg

splash-image.jpg

36 ms

94-percent.svg

94-percent.svg

114 ms

asset-screens.png.webp

asset-screens.png.webp

227 ms

mark-black-white.png.webp

mark-black-white.png.webp

234 ms

asset-testimonial-company.png.webp

asset-testimonial-company.png.webp

236 ms

asset-partner-logo-google.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-google.png.webp

37 ms

asset-partner-logo-ping.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-ping.png.webp

36 ms

asset-partner-logo-woorank.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-woorank.png.webp

39 ms

asset-partner-logo-paypal.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-paypal.png.webp

64 ms

asset-partner-logo-callrail.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-callrail.png.webp

66 ms

asset-partner-logo-yelp.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-yelp.png.webp

66 ms

asset-partner-logo-dmca.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-dmca.png.webp

68 ms

asset-partner-logo-thervo.png.webp

asset-partner-logo-thervo.png.webp

67 ms

menu-icons-sprite.png

menu-icons-sprite.png

70 ms

app.js

app.js

41 ms

6439-607-10-6382.js

6439-607-10-6382.js

23 ms

c

c

86 ms

application2.js

application2.js

124 ms

Accessibility Review

webstract.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webstract.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

webstract.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webstract.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webstract.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webstract.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webstract. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: