43 sec in total
868 ms
41.6 sec
517 ms
Click here to check amazing Webtechnica content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webtechnica.net
This domain may be for sale!
Visit webtechnica.netWe analyzed Webtechnica.net page load time and found that the first response time was 868 ms and then it took 42.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
webtechnica.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
868 ms
1215 ms
1593 ms
465 ms
466 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Webtechnica.net, 35% (42 requests) were made to Yibet.cc and 9% (11 requests) were made to Bajiuqier.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.1 sec) relates to the external source Qzapp.qlogo.cn.
Page size can be reduced by 974.9 kB (35%)
2.8 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Webtechnica.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webtechnica images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 682.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 682.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtechnica.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (43%)
110
63
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtechnica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webtechnica.net
868 ms
www.webtechnica.net
1215 ms
styles.css
1593 ms
ajax.js
465 ms
function.js
466 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
1900 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
2424 ms
mbPlayer-jPlayer.js
485 ms
jquery-ui.js
13742 ms
base.js
704 ms
logajax.js
727 ms
realindex
1605 ms
js.js
782 ms
100
16030 ms
100
16141 ms
logo.png
1029 ms
search.gif
235 ms
down.gif
239 ms
116.jpg.small.jpg
484 ms
115.jpg.small.jpg
701 ms
114.jpg.small.jpg
713 ms
nan_nopic.jpg
5671 ms
112.jpg.small.jpg
1478 ms
jquery.basic.1.0.js
861 ms
checkimg.php
940 ms
ser_ico.gif
237 ms
index
250 ms
nav_bg.gif
246 ms
nav_hover.gif
1712 ms
title_pink.gif
244 ms
18776357.js
724 ms
17830147.js
872 ms
517 ms
share.js
1088 ms
style_special.css
707 ms
common.css
478 ms
style.css
1197 ms
style_index.css
733 ms
jquery.min.js
4858 ms
jquery.min.js
1765 ms
home_banner.js
722 ms
tongji.js
496 ms
slide_api.js
385 ms
slide_view.js
770 ms
tangram.js
3215 ms
api_base.js
828 ms
view_base.js
1989 ms
logger.js
433 ms
slide_share.css
379 ms
r5.gif
386 ms
icons_0_16.png
1716 ms
qg1.jpg
1224 ms
qg0.jpg
480 ms
yzc1.jpg
738 ms
yzc0.jpg
471 ms
yd1.jpg
719 ms
yd0.jpg
482 ms
nb881.jpg
942 ms
nb880.gif
957 ms
to882.jpg
964 ms
to880.jpg
1197 ms
huangguan1.jpg
1233 ms
huangguan0.jpg
1420 ms
def2.jpg
1929 ms
553dddaad74fd.jpg
1448 ms
57034bb926a5e.jpg
1679 ms
559b9679e6ffa.jpg
1713 ms
553df486a10a4.jpg
1726 ms
553defb24ca31.jpg
1892 ms
553de3a84c918.jpg
1936 ms
56ff36ef22bba.jpg
2162 ms
553de04ca6208.jpg
2201 ms
553de8b4af2ea.jpg
2222 ms
56a5d3f06019e.jpg
2363 ms
56c3d290527d7.jpg
2415 ms
57031d20ac691.jpg
2421 ms
56fc829b7f1b5.jpg
2640 ms
56f2106ddddd2.png
4169 ms
56f20e13aa60b.jpg
2960 ms
56ef9779b413f.jpg
2849 ms
foot.png
2892 ms
score_8dbd1b9.png
2644 ms
score2_e281cef.png
2860 ms
like_fe71b2c.png
3160 ms
btn1_c7dd2d3.png
3312 ms
R4pCTZu
1116 ms
17797649.js
843 ms
z_stat.php
705 ms
2620 ms
ApiSus.php
472 ms
zuixin.php
3131 ms
FangkeHa.php
513 ms
FangkeGo.php
523 ms
GetCookies.php
1540 ms
Xu.php
3977 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
8849 ms
swfobject-2.2.min.js
1464 ms
evercookie.js
2214 ms
show_fel
1320 ms
icon_0.gif
1029 ms
stat.htm
562 ms
core.php
1183 ms
9.gif
916 ms
login
5424 ms
app.gif
1072 ms
ApiBack.php
476 ms
c_icon_2_tiny.png
8 ms
2078 ms
c_login_1.js
224 ms
cross_proxy.html
473 ms
pt_get_uins
8 ms
pt_get_uins
0 ms
ptqrshow
766 ms
load.gif
2 ms
pt_get_uins
0 ms
pt_get_uins
1 ms
pt_get_uins
1 ms
ptlogin_report
1088 ms
ptui_ver.js
484 ms
webtechnica.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webtechnica.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webtechnica.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtechnica.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webtechnica.net main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
webtechnica.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webtechnica. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: