7.1 sec in total
460 ms
5.6 sec
1 sec
Visit webtoapp.design now to see the best up-to-date Webto App content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webtoapp.design
Convert Website to App ✅ Android & iOS ✅ No Code ✅ Push Notifications ✅ Automatically Shows Website Changes ✅
Visit webtoapp.designWe analyzed Webtoapp.design page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
webtoapp.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
460 ms
1382 ms
20 ms
42 ms
666 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Webtoapp.design, 2% (1 request) were made to Plausible.webtoapp.design and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.paddle.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Webtoapp.design.
Page size can be reduced by 32.0 kB (53%)
60.1 kB
28.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Webtoapp.design main page is 60.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 41.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webto App images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 653 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (45%)
33
18
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webto App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webtoapp.design
460 ms
bootstrap-4.5.3.min.css
1382 ms
custom.css
20 ms
sentry.min.js
42 ms
plausible.js
666 ms
paddle.js
40 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
27 ms
bootstrap-4.5.3.bundle.min.js
24 ms
logo.svg
69 ms
homechoice.webp
69 ms
The%20DAA.webp
70 ms
ALBA%20BERLIN.webp
779 ms
easyApotheke-transparent.webp
68 ms
cupioblack.webp
582 ms
real-time-sync.svg
74 ms
push-notifications-2.svg
79 ms
app-installation.svg
70 ms
security-on.svg
72 ms
business-deal.svg
93 ms
team-spirit.svg
89 ms
apple-app-store.webp
1813 ms
google-play-store.webp
99 ms
amazon-app-store.webp
105 ms
huawei-app-gallery.webp
938 ms
programming.svg
106 ms
advanced-customization.svg
1540 ms
verified.svg
431 ms
update.svg
448 ms
web-devices.svg
465 ms
compatibility.svg
475 ms
jan-bunk.webp
488 ms
en.png
497 ms
de.png
514 ms
es.png
524 ms
fr.png
533 ms
nl.png
544 ms
it.png
554 ms
sv.png
570 ms
pt_BR.png
577 ms
bundle.min.js
83 ms
247 ms
fontawesome.min.css
590 ms
solid.min.css
335 ms
timeline.css
10 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
975 ms
webtoapp.design accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
webtoapp.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
webtoapp.design SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtoapp.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webtoapp.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webtoapp.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webto App. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: