Tools & Wizards About Us
webtoolkit.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

webtoolkit.eu

Wt, C++ Web Toolkit — Emweb

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

438 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

347 ms

webtoolkit.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to webtoolkit.eu homepage info - get ready to check Web Toolkit best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about webtoolkit.eu

Emweb provides complete solutions for web-based user interfaces using our popular open source library Wt.

Visit webtoolkit.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Webtoolkit.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webtoolkit.eu performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wt

438 ms

wt.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

156 ms

css

30 ms

slider.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webtoolkit.eu, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (438 ms) belongs to the original domain Webtoolkit.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.1 kB (17%)

Content Size

289.9 kB

After Optimization

240.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webtoolkit.eu main page is 289.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 143.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 143.8 kB
  • After minification 117.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Web Toolkit needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 54.2 kB
  • After minification 54.2 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 504 B

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtoolkit.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (17%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Toolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wt

wt

438 ms

wt.css

wt.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

156 ms

css

css

30 ms

slider.css

slider.css

310 ms

style-wt.css

style-wt.css

318 ms

blog.css

blog.css

239 ms

asciidoc.css

asciidoc.css

244 ms

sourceview.css

sourceview.css

245 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

330 ms

logo-wt.png

logo-wt.png

78 ms

foto1.jpg

foto1.jpg

80 ms

download_white.png

download_white.png

98 ms

book_white.png

book_white.png

99 ms

gallery_white.png

gallery_white.png

98 ms

icon-development@2x.png

icon-development@2x.png

97 ms

icon-products@2x.png

icon-products@2x.png

155 ms

icon-support@2x.png

icon-support@2x.png

159 ms

icon-smartphone@2x.png

icon-smartphone@2x.png

161 ms

icon-purple-connect@2x.png

icon-purple-connect@2x.png

162 ms

icon-purple-desktop@2x.png

icon-purple-desktop@2x.png

163 ms

icon-purple-laptop@2x.png

icon-purple-laptop@2x.png

164 ms

icon-purple-rack@2x.png

icon-purple-rack@2x.png

274 ms

icon-purple-servers@2x.png

icon-purple-servers@2x.png

275 ms

icon-purple-smartphone@2x.png

icon-purple-smartphone@2x.png

275 ms

blooloc-logo.png

blooloc-logo.png

275 ms

intel-logo.png

intel-logo.png

275 ms

philips-logo.png

philips-logo.png

276 ms

BXPO-logo.png

BXPO-logo.png

308 ms

rivm-logo.png

rivm-logo.png

314 ms

sap-logo.png

sap-logo.png

318 ms

atos-logo.png

atos-logo.png

322 ms

noesis-logo.png

noesis-logo.png

325 ms

graebert-logo.png

graebert-logo.png

326 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

32 ms

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

44 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

52 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

72 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

396 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

js

js

94 ms

Accessibility Review

webtoolkit.eu accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webtoolkit.eu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

webtoolkit.eu SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtoolkit.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webtoolkit.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webtoolkit.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Toolkit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: